![]() | East Riding of Yorkshire was one of the Geography and places good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Revise
Style:
Create
|
This article definitely needs to be broken into sections: the infobox is massive, and it's confusing (and I understand it). In particular the ceremonial county and unitary authority need to be separated. The coat of arms only related to the ua. The admin county had a completely different coa and anyway needs its own section. Basically we have a number of entities which share the same name, but very different areas. Lozleader 20:54, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
How does that look as a start? Morwen - Talk 14:03, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Might be interesting to find out when the former Haltemprice UD was parished. From the ONS codes for the parishes: this appears to be after Beverley was parished: the parish codes are
00FB164 Wressle CP 00FB165 Yapham CP 00FB166 Beverley CP 00FB167 Cottingham CP 00FB168 Anlaby with Anlaby Common CP 00FB169 Bridlington CP 00FB170 Kirk Ella CP 00FB171 Willerby CP
Morwen - Talk 16:37, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
"The eponymous River Hull drains the area north of Kingston" sounds like gibberish to me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.189.29.53 ( talk) 11:55, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
This page seems to need more information about education in this area. Is there a university? A population of this size probably should have at least one! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.138.172.201 ( talk) 07:44, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
Leconfield is a Met Office weather station showing current statistics. Does anyone know if historical climate statistics are available as they would be more representative than High Mowthorpe?-- Harkey ( talk) 18:24, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Should we remove the table as per previous comments on this when doing the Kingston upon Hull article? Keith D ( talk) 11:32, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Could someone please find a way to mention that the current administrative/ceremonial East Riding does not cover the same extent as the old Historic East Riding once did - it seems, this article is accepting the notion the 1888-1974 county was revived, when it's merely a revived name for the new county from 1996. Any ideas? An index of metals ( talk) 13:56, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Done! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.109.87.122 ( talk) 01:44, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
(Came here after noticing the peer review request). Would it be worth mentioning something about Hull in the lead? Particularly as the article covers both the unitary authority and ceremonial county (of which it is a part). I know it will be tricky to word something, without going into the full details, but it's important as the dominant settlement of the area, even if it isn't in the unitary authority. Quantpole ( talk) 14:27, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
The lead currently says: "It is named after the historic East Riding of Yorkshire (one of three ridings alongside the North Riding and West Riding), which also constituted a ceremonial and administrative county until 1974." When did the East Riding first become an administrative county in its own right, more than just a thrid of Yorkshire? Or is that question impossible to answer succinctly? almost- instinct 09:24, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on
East Riding of Yorkshire. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 23:38, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:East Riding of Yorkshire/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Initial points -
|
Last edited at 22:53, 5 February 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 14:00, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
We need the 2015 results in /info/en/?search=East_Riding_of_Yorkshire_Council_election,_2015 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.53.143.188 ( talk) 17:09, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on East Riding of Yorkshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:21, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Given that they are unitary authorities, ought they not to be yellow? Robin S. Taylor ( talk) 21:40, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on East Riding of Yorkshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:21, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 16 external links on East Riding of Yorkshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:33, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on East Riding of Yorkshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.naturalareas.naturalengland.org.uk/Science/natural/profiles%5CnaProfile19.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://p1.countryside.gov.uk/LAR/Landscape/DL/heritage_coasts/flamboroughhc.asp{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.naturalareas.naturalengland.org.uk/Science/natural/profiles%5CnaProfile20.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.naturalareas.naturalengland.org.uk/Science/natural/profiles%5CnaProfile16.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:17, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on East Riding of Yorkshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.thisishullandeastriding.co.uk/beverleylocal/news/schools/result-fails-halt-county-s-GCSE-slide-rankings/article-620537-detail/article.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.realyorkshire.co.uk/When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:54, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
There should be a seperate unitary authority article as it covers the whole unitary authority of East Riding but not Hull. It's confusing to the readers to cramp in Hull and east riding as one article but then have no seperate unitary authority article for the east riding which Hull is not seperate from. The county and unitary are not the same. One has Hull and other doesn't. I did mention this back on Wikigeography but nobody really engaged with it.
@ Crouch, Swale: has reverted and redirected my article. Then what grounds does the ceremonial county cover the unitary authority but not Hull yet this article talks about both Hull and the unitary authority as one?
I sourced it well and took ages putting together the article. So what did I do wrong? To earn a complete redirect and erasion of my article? DragonofBatley ( talk) 20:09, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Ahh sorry saw your name appear first. @ Keith D:, why was the above done? Nobody had issues with me splitting County Durham and Shropshire into seperate articles. So what's the issue surrounding East Riding of Yorkshire? The district covers the unitary authority which doesn't include Hull. It can be done but how would you approach it and Crouch Swale? As the og article covers both the unitary authority and Hull. DragonofBatley ( talk) 20:22, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Not particularly those latter two as they were discussed and voted to be kept. They covered the new unitary authorities which were formed from previous boroughs and districts into one big Unitary Authority.
It take forever to list each one individually but Shropshire and County Durham can have a pass for the fact one unitary authority was created to cover the previous districts.
In the case of East Riding, it's not clear fully where Hull lies. It lies in the county but has its own unitary authority article. But east riding minus Hull has only a council article with no real insight into the unitary authority.
It might be better to make a unitary authority article for east riding and merge the council into it?
But Durham and Shropshire are based on the former boroughs and districts being merged into one unitary authority for each county.
But I do think East Riding is in good stead to be given a unitary authority article and maybe the council article merged into a unitary authority article...just saying DragonofBatley ( talk) 21:01, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
So @ Keith D:. I suppose merge the Hull article back into the East Riding of Yorkshire article? As it is part of the county. No need for a seperate article is there? DragonofBatley ( talk) 23:16, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_UK_geography#Hull_merger_into_East_Riding_of_Yorkshire_or_Hull%2C_East_Riding_of_Yorkshire_county_and_East_Riding_of_Yorkshire_district%3F DragonofBatley ( talk) 16:01, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The article requires some work to meet GA criteria again.
![]() | East Riding of Yorkshire was one of the Geography and places good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Revise
Style:
Create
|
This article definitely needs to be broken into sections: the infobox is massive, and it's confusing (and I understand it). In particular the ceremonial county and unitary authority need to be separated. The coat of arms only related to the ua. The admin county had a completely different coa and anyway needs its own section. Basically we have a number of entities which share the same name, but very different areas. Lozleader 20:54, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
How does that look as a start? Morwen - Talk 14:03, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Might be interesting to find out when the former Haltemprice UD was parished. From the ONS codes for the parishes: this appears to be after Beverley was parished: the parish codes are
00FB164 Wressle CP 00FB165 Yapham CP 00FB166 Beverley CP 00FB167 Cottingham CP 00FB168 Anlaby with Anlaby Common CP 00FB169 Bridlington CP 00FB170 Kirk Ella CP 00FB171 Willerby CP
Morwen - Talk 16:37, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
"The eponymous River Hull drains the area north of Kingston" sounds like gibberish to me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.189.29.53 ( talk) 11:55, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
This page seems to need more information about education in this area. Is there a university? A population of this size probably should have at least one! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.138.172.201 ( talk) 07:44, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
Leconfield is a Met Office weather station showing current statistics. Does anyone know if historical climate statistics are available as they would be more representative than High Mowthorpe?-- Harkey ( talk) 18:24, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Should we remove the table as per previous comments on this when doing the Kingston upon Hull article? Keith D ( talk) 11:32, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Could someone please find a way to mention that the current administrative/ceremonial East Riding does not cover the same extent as the old Historic East Riding once did - it seems, this article is accepting the notion the 1888-1974 county was revived, when it's merely a revived name for the new county from 1996. Any ideas? An index of metals ( talk) 13:56, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Done! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.109.87.122 ( talk) 01:44, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
(Came here after noticing the peer review request). Would it be worth mentioning something about Hull in the lead? Particularly as the article covers both the unitary authority and ceremonial county (of which it is a part). I know it will be tricky to word something, without going into the full details, but it's important as the dominant settlement of the area, even if it isn't in the unitary authority. Quantpole ( talk) 14:27, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
The lead currently says: "It is named after the historic East Riding of Yorkshire (one of three ridings alongside the North Riding and West Riding), which also constituted a ceremonial and administrative county until 1974." When did the East Riding first become an administrative county in its own right, more than just a thrid of Yorkshire? Or is that question impossible to answer succinctly? almost- instinct 09:24, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on
East Riding of Yorkshire. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 23:38, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:East Riding of Yorkshire/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Initial points -
|
Last edited at 22:53, 5 February 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 14:00, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
We need the 2015 results in /info/en/?search=East_Riding_of_Yorkshire_Council_election,_2015 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.53.143.188 ( talk) 17:09, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on East Riding of Yorkshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:21, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Given that they are unitary authorities, ought they not to be yellow? Robin S. Taylor ( talk) 21:40, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on East Riding of Yorkshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:21, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 16 external links on East Riding of Yorkshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:33, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on East Riding of Yorkshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.naturalareas.naturalengland.org.uk/Science/natural/profiles%5CnaProfile19.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://p1.countryside.gov.uk/LAR/Landscape/DL/heritage_coasts/flamboroughhc.asp{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.naturalareas.naturalengland.org.uk/Science/natural/profiles%5CnaProfile20.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.naturalareas.naturalengland.org.uk/Science/natural/profiles%5CnaProfile16.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:17, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on East Riding of Yorkshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.thisishullandeastriding.co.uk/beverleylocal/news/schools/result-fails-halt-county-s-GCSE-slide-rankings/article-620537-detail/article.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.realyorkshire.co.uk/When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:54, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
There should be a seperate unitary authority article as it covers the whole unitary authority of East Riding but not Hull. It's confusing to the readers to cramp in Hull and east riding as one article but then have no seperate unitary authority article for the east riding which Hull is not seperate from. The county and unitary are not the same. One has Hull and other doesn't. I did mention this back on Wikigeography but nobody really engaged with it.
@ Crouch, Swale: has reverted and redirected my article. Then what grounds does the ceremonial county cover the unitary authority but not Hull yet this article talks about both Hull and the unitary authority as one?
I sourced it well and took ages putting together the article. So what did I do wrong? To earn a complete redirect and erasion of my article? DragonofBatley ( talk) 20:09, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Ahh sorry saw your name appear first. @ Keith D:, why was the above done? Nobody had issues with me splitting County Durham and Shropshire into seperate articles. So what's the issue surrounding East Riding of Yorkshire? The district covers the unitary authority which doesn't include Hull. It can be done but how would you approach it and Crouch Swale? As the og article covers both the unitary authority and Hull. DragonofBatley ( talk) 20:22, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Not particularly those latter two as they were discussed and voted to be kept. They covered the new unitary authorities which were formed from previous boroughs and districts into one big Unitary Authority.
It take forever to list each one individually but Shropshire and County Durham can have a pass for the fact one unitary authority was created to cover the previous districts.
In the case of East Riding, it's not clear fully where Hull lies. It lies in the county but has its own unitary authority article. But east riding minus Hull has only a council article with no real insight into the unitary authority.
It might be better to make a unitary authority article for east riding and merge the council into it?
But Durham and Shropshire are based on the former boroughs and districts being merged into one unitary authority for each county.
But I do think East Riding is in good stead to be given a unitary authority article and maybe the council article merged into a unitary authority article...just saying DragonofBatley ( talk) 21:01, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
So @ Keith D:. I suppose merge the Hull article back into the East Riding of Yorkshire article? As it is part of the county. No need for a seperate article is there? DragonofBatley ( talk) 23:16, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_UK_geography#Hull_merger_into_East_Riding_of_Yorkshire_or_Hull%2C_East_Riding_of_Yorkshire_county_and_East_Riding_of_Yorkshire_district%3F DragonofBatley ( talk) 16:01, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The article requires some work to meet GA criteria again.