This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Scotland High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. UK geography High‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please merge relevant content, if any, from Tom Johnston House per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Johnston House. (If there is nothing to merge, just leave it as a redirect.) Thanks. — Quarl ^{( talk)} 2007-04-08 07:49Z

I would really like to see East Dunbartonshire merged with West Dunbartonshire. I mean really considering the land area it's a waste of resources having two tiny counties. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Series premiere (remake) ( talk • contribs) 09:07, 6 December 2008 (UTC) reply

Does this mean politically or on the wiki? Each of the council areas has its own page so I guess East & West Dunbartonshire are included in that. Lord Spring Onion ( talk) 21:02, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

East Dunbartonshire has a coat of arms, which are springing up again on the boundaries. Does anyone have an appropriate picture of it? Macarism ( talk) 12:33, 5 May 2009 (UTC) reply