Earth structure has been listed as one of the
Engineering and technology good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: May 25, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
A fact from Earth structure appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 3 May 2014 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Rosiestep ( talk · contribs) 02:05, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
I'll review this one within the week. At first glance, it seems like you've done a nice job on it. -- Rosiestep ( talk) 02:05, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
@ Dr. Blofeld: & @ Aymatth2: Not much to do on this one but I'll put it on hold for the 7 days in case you're busy with other things. Please ping me when you'd like me to take another look. -- Rosiestep ( talk) 02:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
@ Rosiestep: All addressed now I think except the first one which I'll ask Aymatth2 to add. Thanks for the review!♦ Dr. Blofeld 07:40, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Good job. Looks adequate for GA. -- Rosiestep ( talk) 13:53, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Earth structure. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:02, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
I just added a section called Structural Issues. I hope it's not too detailed... I have mostly referred to others' work, but I included one link to my own document because I do not know anyone else who has produced research like this. I am unpaid but have a non-profit called Build Simple and produced a needed field soil strength test- see reference 100. I did not add a link to the page although it's online. If someone else thinks that is merited, it's at https://buildsimple.org/soil-tests.php Thanks! EBResearcher ( talk) 19:08, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi. This is the writing of for
Tulou
--
Visionhelp (
talk)
21:12, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
https://whc.unesco.org/en/earthen-architecture/
--
Visionhelp (
talk)
08:07, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi. I am very wondering about this title, this choice of word(ing), to this topic. But I will never be familiar with a none native language as english is for me. From this I cannot estimate the possibly more than one meaning of the word ´earth´, and how to use.
For example: for soil and earth in german is only word with the exact same meaning, but not really, because of the earth is one and the soil is an other meaning. But having only this one word for both, then it is so just.
From this - my base - I may be wondering about not using the word soil instead of earth. But perhaps I may be enlightened, sophisticated, illuminated, solved, clarified; sorry this (
https://www.dict.cc/?s=aufgekl%C3%A4rt)
Thank You very much. --
Visionhelp (
talk)
13:41, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Saw this today:
Peaceray ( talk) 23:34, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Unfortunately, incorrect terminology is often used in connection with earth building and new terms are constantly being invented. For example, "mud", "earth" and "loam" are regularly and indiscriminately used to describe a building material. This can and regularly does lead to misunderstandings. Since people live in it, this can also be very dangerous. It is probably not Wikipedia's job to define and standardize terms, but this problem should be pointed out in the article, until its cleaned up.
AChatNoir ( talk) 16:19, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
Earth structure has been listed as one of the
Engineering and technology good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: May 25, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
A fact from Earth structure appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 3 May 2014 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Rosiestep ( talk · contribs) 02:05, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
I'll review this one within the week. At first glance, it seems like you've done a nice job on it. -- Rosiestep ( talk) 02:05, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
@ Dr. Blofeld: & @ Aymatth2: Not much to do on this one but I'll put it on hold for the 7 days in case you're busy with other things. Please ping me when you'd like me to take another look. -- Rosiestep ( talk) 02:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
@ Rosiestep: All addressed now I think except the first one which I'll ask Aymatth2 to add. Thanks for the review!♦ Dr. Blofeld 07:40, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Good job. Looks adequate for GA. -- Rosiestep ( talk) 13:53, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Earth structure. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:02, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
I just added a section called Structural Issues. I hope it's not too detailed... I have mostly referred to others' work, but I included one link to my own document because I do not know anyone else who has produced research like this. I am unpaid but have a non-profit called Build Simple and produced a needed field soil strength test- see reference 100. I did not add a link to the page although it's online. If someone else thinks that is merited, it's at https://buildsimple.org/soil-tests.php Thanks! EBResearcher ( talk) 19:08, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi. This is the writing of for
Tulou
--
Visionhelp (
talk)
21:12, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
https://whc.unesco.org/en/earthen-architecture/
--
Visionhelp (
talk)
08:07, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi. I am very wondering about this title, this choice of word(ing), to this topic. But I will never be familiar with a none native language as english is for me. From this I cannot estimate the possibly more than one meaning of the word ´earth´, and how to use.
For example: for soil and earth in german is only word with the exact same meaning, but not really, because of the earth is one and the soil is an other meaning. But having only this one word for both, then it is so just.
From this - my base - I may be wondering about not using the word soil instead of earth. But perhaps I may be enlightened, sophisticated, illuminated, solved, clarified; sorry this (
https://www.dict.cc/?s=aufgekl%C3%A4rt)
Thank You very much. --
Visionhelp (
talk)
13:41, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Saw this today:
Peaceray ( talk) 23:34, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Unfortunately, incorrect terminology is often used in connection with earth building and new terms are constantly being invented. For example, "mud", "earth" and "loam" are regularly and indiscriminately used to describe a building material. This can and regularly does lead to misunderstandings. Since people live in it, this can also be very dangerous. It is probably not Wikipedia's job to define and standardize terms, but this problem should be pointed out in the article, until its cleaned up.
AChatNoir ( talk) 16:19, 5 November 2023 (UTC)