This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
The Illinois color is wrong. We have early voting at the polls and not just mail in. We've had it since 2006. I don't know how to change the color Dkriegls ( talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 03:53, 15 October 2008 (UTC).
Um... I've never heard the term "vote banking" in reference to early voting. Can anyone back this up? - Electiontechnology 05:20, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
I agree
I removed this sentence from the top of the article: 'I believe early voting was first adopted in Texas and not Florida. Texas adopted in-person early voting in 1989 and it was first used in a Presidential election in 1992.' 135.196.2.145 ( talk) 13:28, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
The map showing which states allow no-excuse early voting is inaccurate (perhaps outdated), since editors report that the portrayals of Illinois and Wisconsin are incorrect. I don't know how to change the states' colors on the map. Can someone help? Thanks. JTRH ( talk) 22:13, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Sometimes, a candidate will withdraw (especially in primary season) but has already received some votes from people who cast early ballots. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.63.16.20 ( talk) 17:21, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
I am reading that some people might have turned against Greg Gianforte (special election for U. S. House seat in Montana in 2017). Those who had already cast early votes could NOT do this.
In Texas, there are complaints this year about wasted early votes in presidential primary. Pete Buttigieg, Amy Klobuchar, and Tom Steyer dropped out but already had some people's early votes. There is no way of re-voting, or of listing more than 1 choice in order of preference (would vote for highest on the list who is still in the running).
Carlm0404 ( talk) 08:28, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Has there never been any noticeable criticism of obvious non-democratic aspects of this? Or even a motivation as to why this should be permittied for people who would be able to vote regularly, as opposed to the long accepted pillar of democracy: one day, one vote? -- SergeWoodzing ( talk) 23:55, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
I deleted the map, it is not accurate at all. California no longer has early in person voting, and hasn't in many years. We only have early voting by absentee mail in. -- 98.208.19.245 ( talk) 20:24, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Early voting. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 17:14, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Early voting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:36, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Early voting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:14, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
I have removed a paragraph of the lead section that states: "The amount of voters who vote early has increased in recent years in many countries. As unconditional (no excuse) early voting has gained ground, it has been criticized as damaging to the democratic process."
This content is really terrible. Many different reasons for removal:
Content must stay out per WP:ONUS unless and until a consensus develops for inclusion (which it cannot due to all the points above).
-- Neutrality talk 16:52, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
The Illinois color is wrong. We have early voting at the polls and not just mail in. We've had it since 2006. I don't know how to change the color Dkriegls ( talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 03:53, 15 October 2008 (UTC).
Um... I've never heard the term "vote banking" in reference to early voting. Can anyone back this up? - Electiontechnology 05:20, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
I agree
I removed this sentence from the top of the article: 'I believe early voting was first adopted in Texas and not Florida. Texas adopted in-person early voting in 1989 and it was first used in a Presidential election in 1992.' 135.196.2.145 ( talk) 13:28, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
The map showing which states allow no-excuse early voting is inaccurate (perhaps outdated), since editors report that the portrayals of Illinois and Wisconsin are incorrect. I don't know how to change the states' colors on the map. Can someone help? Thanks. JTRH ( talk) 22:13, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Sometimes, a candidate will withdraw (especially in primary season) but has already received some votes from people who cast early ballots. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.63.16.20 ( talk) 17:21, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
I am reading that some people might have turned against Greg Gianforte (special election for U. S. House seat in Montana in 2017). Those who had already cast early votes could NOT do this.
In Texas, there are complaints this year about wasted early votes in presidential primary. Pete Buttigieg, Amy Klobuchar, and Tom Steyer dropped out but already had some people's early votes. There is no way of re-voting, or of listing more than 1 choice in order of preference (would vote for highest on the list who is still in the running).
Carlm0404 ( talk) 08:28, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Has there never been any noticeable criticism of obvious non-democratic aspects of this? Or even a motivation as to why this should be permittied for people who would be able to vote regularly, as opposed to the long accepted pillar of democracy: one day, one vote? -- SergeWoodzing ( talk) 23:55, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
I deleted the map, it is not accurate at all. California no longer has early in person voting, and hasn't in many years. We only have early voting by absentee mail in. -- 98.208.19.245 ( talk) 20:24, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Early voting. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 17:14, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Early voting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:36, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Early voting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:14, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
I have removed a paragraph of the lead section that states: "The amount of voters who vote early has increased in recent years in many countries. As unconditional (no excuse) early voting has gained ground, it has been criticized as damaging to the democratic process."
This content is really terrible. Many different reasons for removal:
Content must stay out per WP:ONUS unless and until a consensus develops for inclusion (which it cannot due to all the points above).
-- Neutrality talk 16:52, 4 December 2022 (UTC)