This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles This article was accepted on 12 June 2014 by reviewer MatthewVanitas ( talk · contribs). Philosophy: Continental Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Continental philosophy

This article was nominated for deletion on 14 June 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

I have compared the original 1900/01 editions of the Logische Untersuchungen with the JN Findlay English translations, which are based on the second editions of 1913/21. I have amended the standard English translation to reflect the text of the first edition. Please, feel free to correct these translations where appropriate.-- Rodney.k.b.parker ( talk) 04:06, 21 June 2014 (UTC) reply