This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Early 2000s recession article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
|
Proposing merger of content, though the basic content is duplicated. I think there's some references that should make it into this article, but I wanted some other eyeballs on the articles before doing anything. mordel ( talk) 20:24, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
A reference was made about the Council of Economic Advisers under Bush making a move to change the beginning of the recession was seen as politically motivated. It used BusinessWeek magazine as a source, but the cite was to an editorial commentary and not to an article. The reference also did not say who saw the move as politically motivated, so the sentence was removed. If a future editor wishes to add a similar sentence it should be from a reputable and unbiased article and not an editorial and/or commentary. RickW7x2 ( talk) 10:42, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
I placed the tag because the intro fails to define the recession, or indeed what a
recession is or the time period during which this one existed (exists?). --
Thinboy00's
sockpuppet
alternate account 21:31, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
The article is too superficial to understand. The root cause of the recession should be explained for it to be effective. A much detail explanation regarding the financial conditions at that period and the political status is also worth to be included. Anyhow nice article —Preceding unsigned comment added by Naveensakhamuri ( talk • contribs) 11:24, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Early 2000s recession. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:48, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: no consensus ~ Amkgp 💬 06:45, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Recession 2000s → Early 2000s recession – Moved without discussion by User:Markdask in February. The current title is unidiomatic and lends itself to confusion with the Great Recession. Raymie ( t • c) 19:07, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Early 2000s recession article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
|
Proposing merger of content, though the basic content is duplicated. I think there's some references that should make it into this article, but I wanted some other eyeballs on the articles before doing anything. mordel ( talk) 20:24, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
A reference was made about the Council of Economic Advisers under Bush making a move to change the beginning of the recession was seen as politically motivated. It used BusinessWeek magazine as a source, but the cite was to an editorial commentary and not to an article. The reference also did not say who saw the move as politically motivated, so the sentence was removed. If a future editor wishes to add a similar sentence it should be from a reputable and unbiased article and not an editorial and/or commentary. RickW7x2 ( talk) 10:42, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
I placed the tag because the intro fails to define the recession, or indeed what a
recession is or the time period during which this one existed (exists?). --
Thinboy00's
sockpuppet
alternate account 21:31, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
The article is too superficial to understand. The root cause of the recession should be explained for it to be effective. A much detail explanation regarding the financial conditions at that period and the political status is also worth to be included. Anyhow nice article —Preceding unsigned comment added by Naveensakhamuri ( talk • contribs) 11:24, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Early 2000s recession. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:48, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: no consensus ~ Amkgp 💬 06:45, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Recession 2000s → Early 2000s recession – Moved without discussion by User:Markdask in February. The current title is unidiomatic and lends itself to confusion with the Great Recession. Raymie ( t • c) 19:07, 19 June 2020 (UTC)