This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have removed alleged. The letters/notes contents are well enough known and reproduced in various biographies. I don't think there is a need to hide behind alleged!
Winchilsea claimed the duke under the cloak of outward zeal for the protestant religion...[carrying] on his insidious designs, for the infringement of our liberties, and the introduction of popery into every department of state [Ref. Elizabeth Longford, Wellington: Pillar of State p 236] Alci12 14:23, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
Anne Finch's marriage (see Wikipedia article on her) Anne Finch was not married to Charles Finch, the 4th Earl of Winchilsea. She married Heneage Finch (15 May 1684)who became the 5th Earl of Winchelsea when his nephew died without issue. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.138.11.94 ( talk) 20:08, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi I have been updating sources for First Lord of the Admiralty in my draft here: User:Navops47/sandbox2. There are discrepancies with articles created and this Debrett's listing here: https://books.google.lk/books?id=v6u5S-H7BCUC&pg=PA88&dq=Daniel+Finch,+8th+Earl+of+Winchilsea+First+Lord+of+the+Admiralty&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiolIrRg8bSAhVIqI8KHWpTBCEQ6AEIHDAB#v=onepage&q=Daniel%20Finch%2C%208th%20Earl%20of%20Winchilsea%20First%20Lord%20of%20the%20Admiralty&f=false
According to listing on page 88 its states that Daniel Finch, 2nd Earl of Nottingham, , 7th Earl of Winchilsea was First Lord of the Admiralty in 1741 and again in 1757, however in the First Lord of the Admiralty it lists the 8th Earl of Winchilsea. I am no expert but when reading the Debrett's section it appears that this article Thomas Finch, 2nd Earl of Winchilsea eldest son of the Elizabeth Finch, 1st Countess of Winchilsea has been named wrong he was the 1st Earl [1] which has now affects all succeeding articles.-- Navops47 ( talk) 04:41, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
References
The result of the move request was: Moved to Earl of Winchilsea. No such user ( talk) 08:15, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Earl of Winchilsea and Nottingham →
Earl of Winchilsea – Peerages usually only share an article when they have never been held separately, i.e. their history is shared and there's no point duplicating it over two articles. This is the case with, for example, the
Earl of Waterford, which redirects to the Earl of Shrewsbury. However,
Earl Talbot has its own article, as the Earl Talbot has not always been Earl of Shrewsbury. Similarly, the Earl of Winchilsea has not always been the
Earl of Nottingham. Nottingham also has its own page, so there's no need for this article to be titled as it is.
A.D.Hope (
talk)
21:24, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have removed alleged. The letters/notes contents are well enough known and reproduced in various biographies. I don't think there is a need to hide behind alleged!
Winchilsea claimed the duke under the cloak of outward zeal for the protestant religion...[carrying] on his insidious designs, for the infringement of our liberties, and the introduction of popery into every department of state [Ref. Elizabeth Longford, Wellington: Pillar of State p 236] Alci12 14:23, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
Anne Finch's marriage (see Wikipedia article on her) Anne Finch was not married to Charles Finch, the 4th Earl of Winchilsea. She married Heneage Finch (15 May 1684)who became the 5th Earl of Winchelsea when his nephew died without issue. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.138.11.94 ( talk) 20:08, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi I have been updating sources for First Lord of the Admiralty in my draft here: User:Navops47/sandbox2. There are discrepancies with articles created and this Debrett's listing here: https://books.google.lk/books?id=v6u5S-H7BCUC&pg=PA88&dq=Daniel+Finch,+8th+Earl+of+Winchilsea+First+Lord+of+the+Admiralty&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiolIrRg8bSAhVIqI8KHWpTBCEQ6AEIHDAB#v=onepage&q=Daniel%20Finch%2C%208th%20Earl%20of%20Winchilsea%20First%20Lord%20of%20the%20Admiralty&f=false
According to listing on page 88 its states that Daniel Finch, 2nd Earl of Nottingham, , 7th Earl of Winchilsea was First Lord of the Admiralty in 1741 and again in 1757, however in the First Lord of the Admiralty it lists the 8th Earl of Winchilsea. I am no expert but when reading the Debrett's section it appears that this article Thomas Finch, 2nd Earl of Winchilsea eldest son of the Elizabeth Finch, 1st Countess of Winchilsea has been named wrong he was the 1st Earl [1] which has now affects all succeeding articles.-- Navops47 ( talk) 04:41, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
References
The result of the move request was: Moved to Earl of Winchilsea. No such user ( talk) 08:15, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Earl of Winchilsea and Nottingham →
Earl of Winchilsea – Peerages usually only share an article when they have never been held separately, i.e. their history is shared and there's no point duplicating it over two articles. This is the case with, for example, the
Earl of Waterford, which redirects to the Earl of Shrewsbury. However,
Earl Talbot has its own article, as the Earl Talbot has not always been Earl of Shrewsbury. Similarly, the Earl of Winchilsea has not always been the
Earl of Nottingham. Nottingham also has its own page, so there's no need for this article to be titled as it is.
A.D.Hope (
talk)
21:24, 23 July 2017 (UTC)