This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Reverted the alteration from 'St Johns Primary' back to 'Egglescliffe C of E' - the name the school itself uses [1] as well as the name used predominantly by locals, when not calling it 'Butts Lane' school. Though the school is very near St. John's church, and uses it on occasion, it isn't named after it. Joistmonkey 09:48, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
There are two links (that I see at present) that go to photos on the website mentioned above. I have two problems with these links so would like to discuss them here.
Firstly, the links are bound to text that does not seem correct. For example, the first photo - of the cafe at Preston Park - is linked through the word 'north'. That's completely useless in terms of describing what the link is.
Secondly, why are these links even mixed into the body of the article? They either need to be placed at the bottom of their respective sections or even at the bottom of the whole page. -- SmartShark ( talk) 02:17, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Although I find this comment amusing, I'm not sure it should be present. 86.18.63.231 ( talk) 20:29, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Reverted the alteration from 'St Johns Primary' back to 'Egglescliffe C of E' - the name the school itself uses [1] as well as the name used predominantly by locals, when not calling it 'Butts Lane' school. Though the school is very near St. John's church, and uses it on occasion, it isn't named after it. Joistmonkey 09:48, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
There are two links (that I see at present) that go to photos on the website mentioned above. I have two problems with these links so would like to discuss them here.
Firstly, the links are bound to text that does not seem correct. For example, the first photo - of the cafe at Preston Park - is linked through the word 'north'. That's completely useless in terms of describing what the link is.
Secondly, why are these links even mixed into the body of the article? They either need to be placed at the bottom of their respective sections or even at the bottom of the whole page. -- SmartShark ( talk) 02:17, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Although I find this comment amusing, I'm not sure it should be present. 86.18.63.231 ( talk) 20:29, 24 October 2010 (UTC)