This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
If any one has links to old historical standards for component values prior to 1952, please post a link or expand the history section. Thanks in advance. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 09:34, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
Please quit renaming the article. Discuss it the talk section, settle on something, then change it. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 03:37, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
The article is mentioning that E24 and below are using different rounding rules than E48 and above. But there are no references, links or other hint to what these rules are or where they are defined. This is problematic, for people trying to implement this algorithmically without having to resort to lookup tables. Please add rounding references if you know it. Jahibadkaret ( talk) 13:22, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Does someone have reliable information in regard to the reason for using the letter "E" in the name of these series? While I can guess several possible reasons, I would like to see this tracked down reliably (and then discussed in the article). -- Matthiaspaul ( talk) 12:23, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
I'm sure that in an early Practical Electronics issue it was mentioned it is E for Electronics. I'll have to dig through my archives to find the reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.127.199.228 ( talk) 10:48, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect E384. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 9#E384 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk) 11:42, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
|
|
User:ARTol 12:39, May 26, 2023
Any idea why this series was established for some electronics parts, while others use the Renard series? ◅ Sebastian 00:02, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Examples:
However this isn't mentioned in the article. E6isnotrounded ( talk) 17:00, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
If any one has links to old historical standards for component values prior to 1952, please post a link or expand the history section. Thanks in advance. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 09:34, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
Please quit renaming the article. Discuss it the talk section, settle on something, then change it. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 03:37, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
The article is mentioning that E24 and below are using different rounding rules than E48 and above. But there are no references, links or other hint to what these rules are or where they are defined. This is problematic, for people trying to implement this algorithmically without having to resort to lookup tables. Please add rounding references if you know it. Jahibadkaret ( talk) 13:22, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Does someone have reliable information in regard to the reason for using the letter "E" in the name of these series? While I can guess several possible reasons, I would like to see this tracked down reliably (and then discussed in the article). -- Matthiaspaul ( talk) 12:23, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
I'm sure that in an early Practical Electronics issue it was mentioned it is E for Electronics. I'll have to dig through my archives to find the reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.127.199.228 ( talk) 10:48, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect E384. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 9#E384 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk) 11:42, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
|
|
User:ARTol 12:39, May 26, 2023
Any idea why this series was established for some electronics parts, while others use the Renard series? ◅ Sebastian 00:02, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Examples:
However this isn't mentioned in the article. E6isnotrounded ( talk) 17:00, 18 April 2024 (UTC)