This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Hong Kong This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article has been marked as needing an infobox. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. Wikipedians in Hong Kong may be able to help! Hong Kong To-do: history watch purge Attention needed (60) ...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (25) Collaboration needed Recommend topic Improvement needed GA-Class articles (58) • B-Class articles (284) Cleanup needed C-Class articles (998) Image needed (344) Destub needed Start-Class articles (5,346) • Stub-Class articles (6,690) Deorphan needed ...orphans Page creation needed Requested articles Miscellaneous tasks ...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (404) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,261) Education This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in Hong Kong English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article feels biased - against the subject EMI schools, eg relying on a particular quote in the opening paragraph, which should broadly lay out the topic. The later paragraph about mixed-code teaching is closer to a neutral starting point.

Moreover, why is EMI defined as relating only to secondary schools? Surely primary and kindergarten too?

Seems much work to be done. 116.48.56.28 ( talk) 18:56, 1 September 2022 (UTC) reply