![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the Symmetrix Remote Data Facility page were merged into EMC Symmetrix. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. (17th November 2016) |
I think something should be noted that while the DMX-3 can have up to 512 GB of cache, all cache in DMX-3 is mirrored, so the effective cache size is only 256 GB. Tster123 21:21, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
The Acronym DRV is used without being explained. Looking for this acronym I found a reference to Dynamic Reallocation Volume. This is not covered in the article.
DMX 4 is release. With 4 GB of Back end bus. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.73.14.62 ( talk) 04:51, August 28, 2007 (UTC)
It would be useful to me if we included the date when a particular device was announced, and also the date when it was (or will be) removed from support. How do others feel about collecting and maintaining such data? Bstark 15301 ( talk) 16:49, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Disclosure - Submitted by an Employee of NetApp who is a competitor of EMC.
I have been told that additions of new engines requires a power down of the whole VMAX array. This was based on personal communication from an ex EMC employee. While this doesn't have publicly verifiable information, neither does the assertion "Online system upgrades are achieved by adding single or multiple VMAX Engines...".
I would suggest that the word "Online" be struck from the sentence
On a secondary note, It would appear that many of the assertions on this page are not backed by externally verifiable references.
Martinjoz ( talk) 00:59, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
Indeed, to echo above, it seems with this change an anonymous user gave all different values for "production years". I would guess these should be ranges anyway, since products are usually produced for more than one. Since this was never sourced, perhaps they should just be removed? W Nowicki ( talk) 23:24, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Many of the PDFs cited are forbidden. 216.63.187.66 ( talk) 14:34, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the Symmetrix Remote Data Facility page were merged into EMC Symmetrix. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. (17th November 2016) |
I think something should be noted that while the DMX-3 can have up to 512 GB of cache, all cache in DMX-3 is mirrored, so the effective cache size is only 256 GB. Tster123 21:21, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
The Acronym DRV is used without being explained. Looking for this acronym I found a reference to Dynamic Reallocation Volume. This is not covered in the article.
DMX 4 is release. With 4 GB of Back end bus. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.73.14.62 ( talk) 04:51, August 28, 2007 (UTC)
It would be useful to me if we included the date when a particular device was announced, and also the date when it was (or will be) removed from support. How do others feel about collecting and maintaining such data? Bstark 15301 ( talk) 16:49, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Disclosure - Submitted by an Employee of NetApp who is a competitor of EMC.
I have been told that additions of new engines requires a power down of the whole VMAX array. This was based on personal communication from an ex EMC employee. While this doesn't have publicly verifiable information, neither does the assertion "Online system upgrades are achieved by adding single or multiple VMAX Engines...".
I would suggest that the word "Online" be struck from the sentence
On a secondary note, It would appear that many of the assertions on this page are not backed by externally verifiable references.
Martinjoz ( talk) 00:59, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
Indeed, to echo above, it seems with this change an anonymous user gave all different values for "production years". I would guess these should be ranges anyway, since products are usually produced for more than one. Since this was never sourced, perhaps they should just be removed? W Nowicki ( talk) 23:24, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Many of the PDFs cited are forbidden. 216.63.187.66 ( talk) 14:34, 28 July 2023 (UTC)