![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Would Certicom agree that their patent claim 6,141,420 is invalidated by prior art? If not, we cannot assert it (according to Wikipedia's neutrality policy, NPOV). We can still describe the argument that it is invalidated, of course, as long as we don't take sides. — Matt Crypto 17:39, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
I removed the following material as OR, POV and legal advice, all inappropriate for Wikipedia. -- agr 16:25, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
The emails by Alexander Klimov and Bodo Moeller in the list of sources contain valuable analysis of the patent situation. Unless someone is willing to replace them with an equally useful source, it makes sense to keep these links in the article. Dimawik ( talk) 04:12, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
If I recall correctly, ECMQV is no longer part of Suite B due to security defects (which Menezes has since remediated), not patent status. I recall reading the papers, but don't have a link handy.
Jeffrey Walton 00:18, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on ECC patents. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:16, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
Can somebody find and add patent number references to entries without them, esp those of Certicom? This allows easier searching for patent end dates. Robbat2 ( talk) 02:29, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Would Certicom agree that their patent claim 6,141,420 is invalidated by prior art? If not, we cannot assert it (according to Wikipedia's neutrality policy, NPOV). We can still describe the argument that it is invalidated, of course, as long as we don't take sides. — Matt Crypto 17:39, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
I removed the following material as OR, POV and legal advice, all inappropriate for Wikipedia. -- agr 16:25, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
The emails by Alexander Klimov and Bodo Moeller in the list of sources contain valuable analysis of the patent situation. Unless someone is willing to replace them with an equally useful source, it makes sense to keep these links in the article. Dimawik ( talk) 04:12, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
If I recall correctly, ECMQV is no longer part of Suite B due to security defects (which Menezes has since remediated), not patent status. I recall reading the papers, but don't have a link handy.
Jeffrey Walton 00:18, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on ECC patents. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:16, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
Can somebody find and add patent number references to entries without them, esp those of Certicom? This allows easier searching for patent end dates. Robbat2 ( talk) 02:29, 23 October 2017 (UTC)