This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Education This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. United States: Government This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government.

This article was nominated for deletion on 15 October 2005. The result of the discussion was keep.

I removed text that was plagiarized from http://www.usac.org/fund-administration/about/how-universal-service-fund-works.aspx . A lot of this article still need to be moved to Universal Service Fund. PuerExMachina 06:07, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply

I moved the text to Universal Service Fund. I have a draft of a replacement for this article at User:PuerExMachina/E-Rate. I welcome comments and help wikifying it. PuerExMachina 18:35, 11 December 2006 (UTC) reply

Since no objections were raised, I moved the draft here. I'm currently using WIkipedia:Harvard referencing as best I can. PuerExMachina 01:38, 18 December 2006 (UTC) reply

I was wondering what the "E" stood for in the name. According to AT&T, it's "Education-rate". This is probably worth incorporating into the article. -- BDD ( talk) 16:51, 28 January 2016 (UTC) reply