 | This article was nominated for deletion on 28 November 2005. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
The mess of numeric attributes cries out for some sort of tabular representation. Anybody up to the task? -- RoySmith 01:48, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
The statistics presented were not from the Shadowrun game, but a conversion into the d20 System. Removed. 70.186.53.10
This article should really be deleted. Or, perhaps more preferable, a Monsters of Shadowrun article created and this merged into it. Very pointless to have an article per foe for an RPG. Sets a bad precedent. -- Dogbreathcanada 00:08, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
This particular creature could also simply be mentioned in the Duzunukwa page as being a depicition in popular culture. User:TheWhitefire 18:13, 15 September 2014
|
| This article was nominated for deletion on 28 November 2005. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
The mess of numeric attributes cries out for some sort of tabular representation. Anybody up to the task? -- RoySmith 01:48, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
The statistics presented were not from the Shadowrun game, but a conversion into the d20 System. Removed. 70.186.53.10
This article should really be deleted. Or, perhaps more preferable, a Monsters of Shadowrun article created and this merged into it. Very pointless to have an article per foe for an RPG. Sets a bad precedent. -- Dogbreathcanada 00:08, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
This particular creature could also simply be mentioned in the Duzunukwa page as being a depicition in popular culture. User:TheWhitefire 18:13, 15 September 2014