![]() | Dvorak technique has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
May 27, 2006. The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that the intensity of a
tropical cyclone (pictured) is usually determined by the
Dvorak technique using only visible and infrared
satellite images? | ||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
More info. Perhaps you could mention storms where Dvorak constraints were broken. That occurred during Elida during the 2002 EPAC season. Also, what are the highest ones? IIRC, Angela in 1995 got up to an 8, along with 2 other storms. Hurricanehink ( talk) 03:42, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Part of the text seems to be cut off at the end. Also, I've seen a chart somewhere with a column for the minimum pressure estimates for pacific basin storms as they have a lower pressure in general. I can't remember if it was on the NHC site or in Dvorak's paper itself. I have it saved somewhere on my computer if you decide to add it and can't locate the numbers. Dr Denim 03:46, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
I remember Elida, she was crazy. Discussion of breaking Dvorak: [1] [2] [3]:
ELIDA HAS BROKEN ALL THE DVORAK RULES. IT HAS INTENSIFIED RAPIDLY SINCE YESTERDAY AND DATA T-NUMBERS ARE UP TO 6.0 PLUS WITH OBJECTIVE NUMBERS REACHING 6.5 DURING THE PAST HOUR OR SO.
-- RattleMan 03:50, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Something else that might be handy is an example satelite image...and for that matter if we could somehow upload the drawings(or replications of them) of the satelite images for different CI numbers that apear in his essay on the technique that'd be really helpful...if I could find a way to make the images on my computer or get my scanned drawings to look smoother I'd be willing to make them...I have them sketched somewhere...anywho Dr Denim 11:43, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Dr Denim 20:09, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Okay...so I uploaded the notes I took when I read the essay onto my deviant art account...although I never got around to finishing the essay but I got a good chunk of it done...
Could we have a wider range of images showing TCs at various CI's. 2.5, 3.0 and 3.5 isn't much of a range. It should give an impression of how it varies from 2.0 up to 8.0. And ideally it shouldn't be solely Atlantic storms.-- Nilfanion ( talk) 09:25, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Images could also be broken down into the various pattern types, though this would require some skill with the dvorak technique. There is a presenation I should throw in the external links which has drawings of the various pattern types at different intensities. TimL 22:52, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Corrected the spelling of Jack's last name on the External Links section. Margie 00:45, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Before time expires, you may want to send it to Did you know... Tito xd( ?!? - help us) 03:47, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
TimL 05:16, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
I removed all references to AFWA (KGWC) providing Dvorak fixes on tropical cyclones. I work there and know they no longer provide fixes. This was mentioned in the 2007 National Hurricane Operations Plan. Also, in the 2007 Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorology Action Items list, Point #12, it said the following:
"Due to recent personnel and funding cuts, the Air Force Weather Agency (AFWA) can no longer dedicate the resources needed to sustain tropical cyclone satellite imagery surveillance and analysis support to the National Hurricane Operations Plan. This cessation of support requires changes in the NHOP to reflect the AFWA termination but continuance of support on request, resources permitting, by the 17th Operational Weather Squadron Meteorological Satellite Operations (SATOPS) Flight (17 OWS/WXJ), Joint Typhoon Warning Center, Pearl Harbor, HI to the Central Pacific Hurricane Center.)
- Senorpepr ( talk) 06:46, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
As far as I can tell, discussion of the CCC (Central Cold Cover) is missing, as well as any real discussion of its evolution.
Thegreatdr (
talk)
02:38, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Noleander ( talk · contribs) 15:42, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi. I can do this review. Can the nominator please reply and confirm that they are still interested in working on the article? -- Noleander ( talk) 15:42, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
End comments from Noleander. --15:46, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Dvorak technique. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:53, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
![]() | Dvorak technique has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
May 27, 2006. The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that the intensity of a
tropical cyclone (pictured) is usually determined by the
Dvorak technique using only visible and infrared
satellite images? | ||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
More info. Perhaps you could mention storms where Dvorak constraints were broken. That occurred during Elida during the 2002 EPAC season. Also, what are the highest ones? IIRC, Angela in 1995 got up to an 8, along with 2 other storms. Hurricanehink ( talk) 03:42, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Part of the text seems to be cut off at the end. Also, I've seen a chart somewhere with a column for the minimum pressure estimates for pacific basin storms as they have a lower pressure in general. I can't remember if it was on the NHC site or in Dvorak's paper itself. I have it saved somewhere on my computer if you decide to add it and can't locate the numbers. Dr Denim 03:46, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
I remember Elida, she was crazy. Discussion of breaking Dvorak: [1] [2] [3]:
ELIDA HAS BROKEN ALL THE DVORAK RULES. IT HAS INTENSIFIED RAPIDLY SINCE YESTERDAY AND DATA T-NUMBERS ARE UP TO 6.0 PLUS WITH OBJECTIVE NUMBERS REACHING 6.5 DURING THE PAST HOUR OR SO.
-- RattleMan 03:50, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Something else that might be handy is an example satelite image...and for that matter if we could somehow upload the drawings(or replications of them) of the satelite images for different CI numbers that apear in his essay on the technique that'd be really helpful...if I could find a way to make the images on my computer or get my scanned drawings to look smoother I'd be willing to make them...I have them sketched somewhere...anywho Dr Denim 11:43, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Dr Denim 20:09, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Okay...so I uploaded the notes I took when I read the essay onto my deviant art account...although I never got around to finishing the essay but I got a good chunk of it done...
Could we have a wider range of images showing TCs at various CI's. 2.5, 3.0 and 3.5 isn't much of a range. It should give an impression of how it varies from 2.0 up to 8.0. And ideally it shouldn't be solely Atlantic storms.-- Nilfanion ( talk) 09:25, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Images could also be broken down into the various pattern types, though this would require some skill with the dvorak technique. There is a presenation I should throw in the external links which has drawings of the various pattern types at different intensities. TimL 22:52, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Corrected the spelling of Jack's last name on the External Links section. Margie 00:45, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Before time expires, you may want to send it to Did you know... Tito xd( ?!? - help us) 03:47, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
TimL 05:16, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
I removed all references to AFWA (KGWC) providing Dvorak fixes on tropical cyclones. I work there and know they no longer provide fixes. This was mentioned in the 2007 National Hurricane Operations Plan. Also, in the 2007 Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorology Action Items list, Point #12, it said the following:
"Due to recent personnel and funding cuts, the Air Force Weather Agency (AFWA) can no longer dedicate the resources needed to sustain tropical cyclone satellite imagery surveillance and analysis support to the National Hurricane Operations Plan. This cessation of support requires changes in the NHOP to reflect the AFWA termination but continuance of support on request, resources permitting, by the 17th Operational Weather Squadron Meteorological Satellite Operations (SATOPS) Flight (17 OWS/WXJ), Joint Typhoon Warning Center, Pearl Harbor, HI to the Central Pacific Hurricane Center.)
- Senorpepr ( talk) 06:46, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
As far as I can tell, discussion of the CCC (Central Cold Cover) is missing, as well as any real discussion of its evolution.
Thegreatdr (
talk)
02:38, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Noleander ( talk · contribs) 15:42, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi. I can do this review. Can the nominator please reply and confirm that they are still interested in working on the article? -- Noleander ( talk) 15:42, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
End comments from Noleander. --15:46, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Dvorak technique. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:53, 22 May 2017 (UTC)