A fact from Dungarvan Town Council appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 27 December 2011 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
In good faith, Iveagh Gardens boldly merged and redirected the content of this (relatively long, long-standing and C-class article?) to Dungarvan. With consideration to WP:MERGEINIT (including that "Articles that have been separate for a long time should usually be discussed first" and "Bold merges may be reverted"), I have reverted this merge. On the basis that I don't see that a merge is necessary. Or that the main WP:MERGEREASONs are met. (The article is not especially short. It is certainly a lot longer than "only one or two sentences". Nor does it duplicate or semi-duplicate the content in the main Dungarvan article. Nor should it, given WP:SS guidelines. And, while there is obviously a link between the two articles, the town council is (and can be) dealt with separately. And has notability in its own right.) Happy to see the articles tagged, and this discussion to be expanded (and consensus to derive), but - personally - I'm not currently seeing the rationale for the merge... Guliolopez ( talk) 20:51, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi SeoR, I do welcome a direct comment on the personal pages if I’m engaged in any mini-project of this sort! It can be a good direct way of getting to the root of things, and at least it means the changes were noticed at the earlier stage, rather than me continuing through with something others had an issue with, but only seeing months later. So on balance, while I think the Dungarvan page would benefit from the merge, I’m happy to see the consensus go in either direction after the standard week. Iveagh Gardens ( talk) 20:44, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
A fact from Dungarvan Town Council appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 27 December 2011 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
In good faith, Iveagh Gardens boldly merged and redirected the content of this (relatively long, long-standing and C-class article?) to Dungarvan. With consideration to WP:MERGEINIT (including that "Articles that have been separate for a long time should usually be discussed first" and "Bold merges may be reverted"), I have reverted this merge. On the basis that I don't see that a merge is necessary. Or that the main WP:MERGEREASONs are met. (The article is not especially short. It is certainly a lot longer than "only one or two sentences". Nor does it duplicate or semi-duplicate the content in the main Dungarvan article. Nor should it, given WP:SS guidelines. And, while there is obviously a link between the two articles, the town council is (and can be) dealt with separately. And has notability in its own right.) Happy to see the articles tagged, and this discussion to be expanded (and consensus to derive), but - personally - I'm not currently seeing the rationale for the merge... Guliolopez ( talk) 20:51, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi SeoR, I do welcome a direct comment on the personal pages if I’m engaged in any mini-project of this sort! It can be a good direct way of getting to the root of things, and at least it means the changes were noticed at the earlier stage, rather than me continuing through with something others had an issue with, but only seeing months later. So on balance, while I think the Dungarvan page would benefit from the merge, I’m happy to see the consensus go in either direction after the standard week. Iveagh Gardens ( talk) 20:44, 7 October 2022 (UTC)