![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 7 March 2011. The result of the discussion was No consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Oppose: There are many reasons to keep this article; the first reason is that even if it was a hill fort that didn't exist, why would if be mentioned on WikiProject Somerset's articles for creation list? It used to be on the List of hill forts and ancient settlements in Somerset which clarifies that it was an Bronze Age hillfort. The investigation in 1966 has been referenced and backed up by sources, the article may be a bit short but it has a lot of consice information on there. Why would Duncorn Hill need to be deleted? It does have a site on the hill. Jaguar ( talk) 16:28, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
Oppose: if only for the reason that this article dispels the myth that there was a hillfort at this site. Without this article that myth may continue to be propagated. Pahazzard ( talk) 22:58, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
See the map It's not clear that the ascent up the A367 from Dunkerton, termed "Dunkerton Hill" is regarded as being on Duncorn Hill. Following this logic the entirety of Odd Down would be located on Duncorn Hill, which is clearly not the case. Duncorn Hill appears to refer to that round mound entirely located north of the B3115, so I am removing this section unless suitable evidence of the extent of Duncorn Hill is provided.-- Pontificalibus ( talk) 10:38, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
A think a redirect with a minor merge of the info to the article on the town or area is probably best for this, but I'm curious how others feel.-- Yaksar (let's chat) 04:42, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Duncorn Hill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:03, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 7 March 2011. The result of the discussion was No consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Oppose: There are many reasons to keep this article; the first reason is that even if it was a hill fort that didn't exist, why would if be mentioned on WikiProject Somerset's articles for creation list? It used to be on the List of hill forts and ancient settlements in Somerset which clarifies that it was an Bronze Age hillfort. The investigation in 1966 has been referenced and backed up by sources, the article may be a bit short but it has a lot of consice information on there. Why would Duncorn Hill need to be deleted? It does have a site on the hill. Jaguar ( talk) 16:28, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
Oppose: if only for the reason that this article dispels the myth that there was a hillfort at this site. Without this article that myth may continue to be propagated. Pahazzard ( talk) 22:58, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
See the map It's not clear that the ascent up the A367 from Dunkerton, termed "Dunkerton Hill" is regarded as being on Duncorn Hill. Following this logic the entirety of Odd Down would be located on Duncorn Hill, which is clearly not the case. Duncorn Hill appears to refer to that round mound entirely located north of the B3115, so I am removing this section unless suitable evidence of the extent of Duncorn Hill is provided.-- Pontificalibus ( talk) 10:38, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
A think a redirect with a minor merge of the info to the article on the town or area is probably best for this, but I'm curious how others feel.-- Yaksar (let's chat) 04:42, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Duncorn Hill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:03, 12 May 2017 (UTC)