This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is part of WikiProject Game theory, an attempt to improve, grow, and standardize Wikipedia's articles related to
Game theory. We need your help! Join in |
Fix a red link |
Add content |
Weigh inGame theoryWikipedia:WikiProject Game theoryTemplate:WikiProject Game theorygame theory articles
This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the
importance scale.
definition please
4. The system can be manipulated by an optimist or pessimist.
Presumably "optimist" and "pessimist" here do not have their ordinary meaning. —
Tamfang (
talk) 00:01, 18 January 2011 (UTC)reply
I think "optimist" means "can make a preferred candidate win" and "pessimist" means "can make a non-preferred candidate lose in favor of one of a set of preferred candidates", but the jargon's a little hard to parse. If "anyone but Bush" voters can prevent Bush from winning, that's pessimistic manipulation; and if Gore voters can make Gore win, that's optimistic manipulation. I could be wrong. See page 4 (306) of www.geocities.jp/kiishimizu/pdf/yt-amc0605.pdf for the exact definition.
77.94.232.40 (
talk) 08:17, 17 January 2012 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is part of WikiProject Game theory, an attempt to improve, grow, and standardize Wikipedia's articles related to
Game theory. We need your help! Join in |
Fix a red link |
Add content |
Weigh inGame theoryWikipedia:WikiProject Game theoryTemplate:WikiProject Game theorygame theory articles
This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the
importance scale.
definition please
4. The system can be manipulated by an optimist or pessimist.
Presumably "optimist" and "pessimist" here do not have their ordinary meaning. —
Tamfang (
talk) 00:01, 18 January 2011 (UTC)reply
I think "optimist" means "can make a preferred candidate win" and "pessimist" means "can make a non-preferred candidate lose in favor of one of a set of preferred candidates", but the jargon's a little hard to parse. If "anyone but Bush" voters can prevent Bush from winning, that's pessimistic manipulation; and if Gore voters can make Gore win, that's optimistic manipulation. I could be wrong. See page 4 (306) of www.geocities.jp/kiishimizu/pdf/yt-amc0605.pdf for the exact definition.
77.94.232.40 (
talk) 08:17, 17 January 2012 (UTC)reply