 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Is there a reliable source for the name Dudeney number: I don't think the name would be used in the only reference cited, by Dudeney himself. Richard Pinch ( talk) 20:07, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
what is the proof that there are only six Confront ( talk) 07:34, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
- Not necessarily the most rigorous or formal, but I tried a proof on my blog as an exercise. HostileFork ( talk) 11:41, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
Apart from the most rudimentary material on generalized Dudeney numbers in one of the links at the bottom, practically the whole of this page looks like original research. Has the brief of Wikipedia changed since the days when I contributed and I used to get 90% of my input deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.9.161.107 ( talk) 13:30, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
|
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Is there a reliable source for the name Dudeney number: I don't think the name would be used in the only reference cited, by Dudeney himself. Richard Pinch ( talk) 20:07, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
what is the proof that there are only six Confront ( talk) 07:34, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
- Not necessarily the most rigorous or formal, but I tried a proof on my blog as an exercise. HostileFork ( talk) 11:41, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
Apart from the most rudimentary material on generalized Dudeney numbers in one of the links at the bottom, practically the whole of this page looks like original research. Has the brief of Wikipedia changed since the days when I contributed and I used to get 90% of my input deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.9.161.107 ( talk) 13:30, 10 July 2020 (UTC)