![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
DuckTales, the Movie: Treasure of the Lost Lamp is based on DuckTales, which is itself based on the works of Carl Barks, but right now the infobox says it's based on, I quote, "DuckTales by Carl Barks", which is nonsense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.49.239.80 ( talk) 17:28, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
This page is a hoax. Someone just copied the DuckTales movie page and made one for Darkwing Duck, which doesn't even have a movie. Delete it please.--
Narlee
23:35, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
I foun out how critics reacted to the film in John Grant's book, Encyclopedia of Walt Disney’s Animated Characters (3rd edition) ISBN 0-7868-6336-6 -- JFP 17:50, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
At first glance, I see nothing in the article about the music in the film. I haven't seen this movie for probably over a decade, and can't remember what kind of music was in the film, but for whatever reason, I seem to remember thinking that the music was important. Maybe it was just important to me, I don't know. Either way, I think there should be some mention of the soundtrack in the article.
Allixpeeke 00:34, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Where did he go? I know Dijon showed up in the series, but what about him? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bluecatcinema ( talk • contribs) 12:53, 4 May 2007 (UTC).
Image:Duck tales movie dvdcover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:30, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Image:Ducktales the movie treasure of the lost lamp.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 21:14, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
It's funny that this movie came out the day i was born.
User: Bryn Morgan —Preceding
undated comment added
07:57, 25 October 2009 (UTC).
Shouldn't Scrooge's hometown be written as Duckburg (with a U after the B), not Duckberg (with an E after the B)?
Brichards85 ( talk) 03:17, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Zanimum ( talk · contribs) 01:00, 20 September 2013 (UTC) Hi! So I'm taking this article on.
First thing... the Disney MovieToons section could just be merged into Production, I'd say. It's not enough for a standalone section. Also, you make it sound like they completely disbanded the studio; the DisneyToon Studios article suggests that they just renamed themselves. Same thing as how Walt Disney Feature Animation is now Walt Disney Animation Studios, just a rename. Can you introduce references to this section?
The critical review section is slightly anemic. DVDLaser's suggestion that it's really three episodes strung together seems relevant to mention, as (having never seen the movie) that seems really possible. Atlantis: Milo's Return was deliberately created that way as a pilot for a series, but whether or not this was intentional, it does talk about the pace of the storytelling. (Washington Post seems to find it as one plot, just over-extended.) -- Zanimum ( talk) 01:00, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Also, can you trim the plot section? It seems rather wordy. Mulan and Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (1937 film) are both shorter plot summaries than Duck Tales.
Just an FYI, I'm probably going to fail this in the end, but I'm hoping that you use this as an opportunity to whip the article into shape. (I'd love it you prove me wrong and get it to GA, but there is a way to go.
Was there a "junior novelization" of the film? Any picture books based on the plot? (Try WorldCat and see if anything shows up.) Any toys or fast food promotions?
Anyway, failing. -- Zanimum ( talk) 14:50, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
What about DuckTales the Movie: Treasure of the Lost Lamp DVD 2015 in Australia? -- 58.168.125.12 ( talk) 04:53, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Wizards do not exist in this fictional universe. There is a magic user that is called a sorcerer but that is not the same thing. I removed Category:Wizards in film from the article as there was no mention of a wizard in the article text so by WP:CATVER that category is not supported by anything in the article. Stating that something else means the same thing is original research and also not supported by anything in the article. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 05:41, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
"A magician, also known as an enchanter (female: enchantress), sorcerer (female: sorceress), mage, warlock, witch, or wizard"shows that magician is the hypernym for all the types of magicians, not that each of the types of magicians listed are synonyms with each other. We know that wizards do not exist in a fictional universe as they are not mentioned in the source material that defines the fictional universe such as the ones in question here. Notice that both witch and wizard are mentioned in the list given and are generally treated as separate things with their own categories even. Warlock, is also on the list and also not a synonym for others listed. A careful reading of Magic (supernatural) § Magicians and Magician (fantasy) § Names and terminology goes into significant detail of why each of those types of magic user mean different things in works of fiction. The assertion that sorcerer and wizard are synonyms is not supported any more than would stating wizard and witch are synonyms or wizard and warlock are synonyms. None of them are and all mean different things. If anything can be gleaned from Wikipedia disambiguation pages, Sorcerer would show Wizard as a type Sorcerer not synonymous with one. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 20:02, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Why am I having to explain edit warring or the third time to an administrator? It doesn't matter that you think you are correct, or this information is wrong - what matters is that you repeatedly removed it. Are you going to accept that you were edit warring to get your preferred version? That your preferred version was correct or incorrect is not being discussed in this paragraph, just whether repeated insertion of contentious information by a single editor after being removed multiple times meets the criteria for edit warring. Yes, or no?
Much of your argument can be used against you. Wikipedia believes that a Sorcerer is the same thing as a Magician. we have an article that states this, not as a hypernym, but as a categorical (no pun intended) statement: A magician, also known as an enchanter (female: enchantress), sorcerer (female: sorceress), mage, warlock, witch, or wizard This statement "also known as" means that the terms are interchangeable. If you agree that witches and wizards are both magicians, why not Sorcerers? Where is the distinction? Chaheel Riens ( talk) 15:36, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
References
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: SL93 ( talk · contribs) 06:19, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
On top of this, there needs to be more details on how it performed in the box office, the soundtrack, and sequels.
I am quick-failing this which makes this the second time. SL93 ( talk) 06:19, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
DuckTales, the Movie: Treasure of the Lost Lamp is based on DuckTales, which is itself based on the works of Carl Barks, but right now the infobox says it's based on, I quote, "DuckTales by Carl Barks", which is nonsense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.49.239.80 ( talk) 17:28, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
This page is a hoax. Someone just copied the DuckTales movie page and made one for Darkwing Duck, which doesn't even have a movie. Delete it please.--
Narlee
23:35, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
I foun out how critics reacted to the film in John Grant's book, Encyclopedia of Walt Disney’s Animated Characters (3rd edition) ISBN 0-7868-6336-6 -- JFP 17:50, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
At first glance, I see nothing in the article about the music in the film. I haven't seen this movie for probably over a decade, and can't remember what kind of music was in the film, but for whatever reason, I seem to remember thinking that the music was important. Maybe it was just important to me, I don't know. Either way, I think there should be some mention of the soundtrack in the article.
Allixpeeke 00:34, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Where did he go? I know Dijon showed up in the series, but what about him? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bluecatcinema ( talk • contribs) 12:53, 4 May 2007 (UTC).
Image:Duck tales movie dvdcover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:30, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Image:Ducktales the movie treasure of the lost lamp.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 21:14, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
It's funny that this movie came out the day i was born.
User: Bryn Morgan —Preceding
undated comment added
07:57, 25 October 2009 (UTC).
Shouldn't Scrooge's hometown be written as Duckburg (with a U after the B), not Duckberg (with an E after the B)?
Brichards85 ( talk) 03:17, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Zanimum ( talk · contribs) 01:00, 20 September 2013 (UTC) Hi! So I'm taking this article on.
First thing... the Disney MovieToons section could just be merged into Production, I'd say. It's not enough for a standalone section. Also, you make it sound like they completely disbanded the studio; the DisneyToon Studios article suggests that they just renamed themselves. Same thing as how Walt Disney Feature Animation is now Walt Disney Animation Studios, just a rename. Can you introduce references to this section?
The critical review section is slightly anemic. DVDLaser's suggestion that it's really three episodes strung together seems relevant to mention, as (having never seen the movie) that seems really possible. Atlantis: Milo's Return was deliberately created that way as a pilot for a series, but whether or not this was intentional, it does talk about the pace of the storytelling. (Washington Post seems to find it as one plot, just over-extended.) -- Zanimum ( talk) 01:00, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Also, can you trim the plot section? It seems rather wordy. Mulan and Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (1937 film) are both shorter plot summaries than Duck Tales.
Just an FYI, I'm probably going to fail this in the end, but I'm hoping that you use this as an opportunity to whip the article into shape. (I'd love it you prove me wrong and get it to GA, but there is a way to go.
Was there a "junior novelization" of the film? Any picture books based on the plot? (Try WorldCat and see if anything shows up.) Any toys or fast food promotions?
Anyway, failing. -- Zanimum ( talk) 14:50, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
What about DuckTales the Movie: Treasure of the Lost Lamp DVD 2015 in Australia? -- 58.168.125.12 ( talk) 04:53, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Wizards do not exist in this fictional universe. There is a magic user that is called a sorcerer but that is not the same thing. I removed Category:Wizards in film from the article as there was no mention of a wizard in the article text so by WP:CATVER that category is not supported by anything in the article. Stating that something else means the same thing is original research and also not supported by anything in the article. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 05:41, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
"A magician, also known as an enchanter (female: enchantress), sorcerer (female: sorceress), mage, warlock, witch, or wizard"shows that magician is the hypernym for all the types of magicians, not that each of the types of magicians listed are synonyms with each other. We know that wizards do not exist in a fictional universe as they are not mentioned in the source material that defines the fictional universe such as the ones in question here. Notice that both witch and wizard are mentioned in the list given and are generally treated as separate things with their own categories even. Warlock, is also on the list and also not a synonym for others listed. A careful reading of Magic (supernatural) § Magicians and Magician (fantasy) § Names and terminology goes into significant detail of why each of those types of magic user mean different things in works of fiction. The assertion that sorcerer and wizard are synonyms is not supported any more than would stating wizard and witch are synonyms or wizard and warlock are synonyms. None of them are and all mean different things. If anything can be gleaned from Wikipedia disambiguation pages, Sorcerer would show Wizard as a type Sorcerer not synonymous with one. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 20:02, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Why am I having to explain edit warring or the third time to an administrator? It doesn't matter that you think you are correct, or this information is wrong - what matters is that you repeatedly removed it. Are you going to accept that you were edit warring to get your preferred version? That your preferred version was correct or incorrect is not being discussed in this paragraph, just whether repeated insertion of contentious information by a single editor after being removed multiple times meets the criteria for edit warring. Yes, or no?
Much of your argument can be used against you. Wikipedia believes that a Sorcerer is the same thing as a Magician. we have an article that states this, not as a hypernym, but as a categorical (no pun intended) statement: A magician, also known as an enchanter (female: enchantress), sorcerer (female: sorceress), mage, warlock, witch, or wizard This statement "also known as" means that the terms are interchangeable. If you agree that witches and wizards are both magicians, why not Sorcerers? Where is the distinction? Chaheel Riens ( talk) 15:36, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
References
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: SL93 ( talk · contribs) 06:19, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
On top of this, there needs to be more details on how it performed in the box office, the soundtrack, and sequels.
I am quick-failing this which makes this the second time. SL93 ( talk) 06:19, 18 August 2019 (UTC)