![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
My edits merely organized the information given in this and related articles, so reverting them (without any proper reasoning) is certainly out of line.
The one exception is the issue whether Ferdinand was to give up the duchy formally (de facto it was occupied already since 1796) in 1801, when his son became King of Etruria, or remained de jure duke until his death a year later.
I do not the answer to that question and invite others to fill in this gap. Str1977 (smile back) 13:39, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
As the template concerning edit summaries says:
Without an edit summary, it's often difficult for other editors to know why what was done was done; when no source is given, things are hopeless.
For someone who seems to know little about the way Wikipedia works, and who has jumped into the middle of a discussion, you are remarkably certain of your opinion. -- Mel Etitis ( Talk) 18:49, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
My edits merely organized the information given in this and related articles, so reverting them (without any proper reasoning) is certainly out of line.
The one exception is the issue whether Ferdinand was to give up the duchy formally (de facto it was occupied already since 1796) in 1801, when his son became King of Etruria, or remained de jure duke until his death a year later.
I do not the answer to that question and invite others to fill in this gap. Str1977 (smile back) 13:39, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
As the template concerning edit summaries says:
Without an edit summary, it's often difficult for other editors to know why what was done was done; when no source is given, things are hopeless.
For someone who seems to know little about the way Wikipedia works, and who has jumped into the middle of a discussion, you are remarkably certain of your opinion. -- Mel Etitis ( Talk) 18:49, 10 March 2007 (UTC)