![]() | Du battant des lames au sommet des montagnes was one of the Geography and places good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I am assessing this article as A class, mid importance. As to English only for article titles, I will note that there is an E Pluribus Unum article. Gallador ( talk) 23:40, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
This discussion is
transcluded from
Talk:Du battant des lames au sommet des montagnes/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.
In order to uphold the quality of
Wikipedia:Good articles, all articles listed as Good articles are being reviewed against the
GA criteria as part of the
GA project quality task force. While all the hard work that has gone into this article is appreciated, unfortunately, as of
September 12,
2008, this article fails to satisfy the criteria, as detailed below. For that reason, the article has been delisted from
WP:GA. However, if improvements are made bringing the article up to standards, the article may be nominated at
WP:GAN. If you feel this decision has been made in error, you may seek remediation at
WP:GAR.
-- Malleus Fatuorum ( talk) 01:00, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
(outdent) I have closed the Good article reassessment as endorsed ( diff). Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 19:28, 28 September 2008 (UTC) I Just see this, I'm not against the idea of reassessing article but the way it has been done for this article is absolutely ridiculous. I wonder if the person who raised arguments such as "should be merged with Reunion" actually read this article. And the rest of the discussion is just well... -- Kimdime69 ( talk) 01:21, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Du battant des lames au sommet des montagnes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:17, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
![]() | Du battant des lames au sommet des montagnes was one of the Geography and places good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I am assessing this article as A class, mid importance. As to English only for article titles, I will note that there is an E Pluribus Unum article. Gallador ( talk) 23:40, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
This discussion is
transcluded from
Talk:Du battant des lames au sommet des montagnes/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.
In order to uphold the quality of
Wikipedia:Good articles, all articles listed as Good articles are being reviewed against the
GA criteria as part of the
GA project quality task force. While all the hard work that has gone into this article is appreciated, unfortunately, as of
September 12,
2008, this article fails to satisfy the criteria, as detailed below. For that reason, the article has been delisted from
WP:GA. However, if improvements are made bringing the article up to standards, the article may be nominated at
WP:GAN. If you feel this decision has been made in error, you may seek remediation at
WP:GAR.
-- Malleus Fatuorum ( talk) 01:00, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
(outdent) I have closed the Good article reassessment as endorsed ( diff). Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 19:28, 28 September 2008 (UTC) I Just see this, I'm not against the idea of reassessing article but the way it has been done for this article is absolutely ridiculous. I wonder if the person who raised arguments such as "should be merged with Reunion" actually read this article. And the rest of the discussion is just well... -- Kimdime69 ( talk) 01:21, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Du battant des lames au sommet des montagnes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:17, 17 December 2016 (UTC)