![]() | Dryopithecus has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: January 17, 2020. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It would bridge a gap if Dryopithecidae could redirect to this page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingcrasher ( talk • contribs) 22:41, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dryopithecus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:35, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Though it is standard for a living species to get its own article, it is highly unusual for an extinct species to have a separate article from the genus article unless there is a great deal of information out there pertaining to a single species (such as Mammoth) which is very much not the case for D. fontani. Further, the article has only one source and it is, word for word, an exact copy of the Wikipedia article, and I'm not sure who plagiarized who User:Dunkleosteus77 | push to talk 19:54, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Jens Lallensack ( talk · contribs) 23:42, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Will start soon. --
Jens Lallensack (
talk)
23:42, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
![]() | Dryopithecus has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: January 17, 2020. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It would bridge a gap if Dryopithecidae could redirect to this page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingcrasher ( talk • contribs) 22:41, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dryopithecus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:35, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Though it is standard for a living species to get its own article, it is highly unusual for an extinct species to have a separate article from the genus article unless there is a great deal of information out there pertaining to a single species (such as Mammoth) which is very much not the case for D. fontani. Further, the article has only one source and it is, word for word, an exact copy of the Wikipedia article, and I'm not sure who plagiarized who User:Dunkleosteus77 | push to talk 19:54, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Jens Lallensack ( talk · contribs) 23:42, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Will start soon. --
Jens Lallensack (
talk)
23:42, 15 January 2020 (UTC)