The image Image:MediaCoverageArabIsraeliConflict CoercionCensorship DryBones.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:24, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
what happend to the Palestianian thing? I mean it may have been poorly worded but it's pretty accurate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.145.250.210 ( talk) 10:04, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
The point re the 7.4% NYTimes story? So many parties were Shildig - mistaken, "the story is wrong" - incorrect - not right - get the point? Who would think that a computer guy who made his night time work into Dry Bones (comic strip) would merit even one percent, let alone more than five. Pi314m ( talk) 18:15, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
How is that line not original research? None of the citation support it and it seems incredibly POV. -- FeldBum ( talk) 14:24, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The image Image:MediaCoverageArabIsraeliConflict CoercionCensorship DryBones.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:24, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
what happend to the Palestianian thing? I mean it may have been poorly worded but it's pretty accurate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.145.250.210 ( talk) 10:04, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
The point re the 7.4% NYTimes story? So many parties were Shildig - mistaken, "the story is wrong" - incorrect - not right - get the point? Who would think that a computer guy who made his night time work into Dry Bones (comic strip) would merit even one percent, let alone more than five. Pi314m ( talk) 18:15, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
How is that line not original research? None of the citation support it and it seems incredibly POV. -- FeldBum ( talk) 14:24, 13 September 2023 (UTC)