This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Drugs.com article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Drugs.com. Please take a moment to review
my edit. You may add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 05:40, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Drugs.com. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:27, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Personally I find the information useful and reliable.
But in some Wikipedia talk pages, for example /info/en/?search=Talk:Donepezil people claim the website is not reliable.
Can you give examples of wrong or unreliable information at drugs.com? And do they correct if one sends corrections?
Do drug companies advertise at drugs.com? Which drugs and which companies recently? If yes, that might lower reliability.
ee1518 ( talk) 06:35, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Basically it seems involved in click bait garbage using Google. They'll list a high interaction for drugs combinations, for instance, in a Google search at the top as, I presume, a sponsored search result, then you click on it and further down will say No Interactions Found followed by a long list of Other Interactions with this Medication Searched or other such garbage. -Reticuli 2600:2B00:7628:D700:4132:F954:E301:8559 ( talk) 12:31, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Drugs.com article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Drugs.com. Please take a moment to review
my edit. You may add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 05:40, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Drugs.com. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:27, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Personally I find the information useful and reliable.
But in some Wikipedia talk pages, for example /info/en/?search=Talk:Donepezil people claim the website is not reliable.
Can you give examples of wrong or unreliable information at drugs.com? And do they correct if one sends corrections?
Do drug companies advertise at drugs.com? Which drugs and which companies recently? If yes, that might lower reliability.
ee1518 ( talk) 06:35, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Basically it seems involved in click bait garbage using Google. They'll list a high interaction for drugs combinations, for instance, in a Google search at the top as, I presume, a sponsored search result, then you click on it and further down will say No Interactions Found followed by a long list of Other Interactions with this Medication Searched or other such garbage. -Reticuli 2600:2B00:7628:D700:4132:F954:E301:8559 ( talk) 12:31, 3 October 2020 (UTC)