Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Status ( talk · contribs) 04:11, 21 June 2012 (UTC) reply

• Lead is a bit short. Can't it be expanded on further?
  • Expanded.-- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 15:11, 21 June 2012 (UTC) reply
• Not sure if Detail is the correct title for the section, but I don't know what else it could be titled.
  • Fixed.-- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 15:11, 21 June 2012 (UTC) reply
• Critical review --> Reception
  • Fixed.-- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 15:11, 21 June 2012 (UTC) reply
• I see no other issues with the article. It is well referenced and written.

• All issues addressed. Passing article. Great work! Statυs ( talk) 16:58, 21 June 2012 (UTC) reply

drive by comment

Way too much copyrighted material in the footnotes. No excuse for this. Editor should have used his own words. Also, one blockquote is attributed to to different sources. How is this? MathewTownsend ( talk) 16:55, 21 July 2012 (UTC) reply