 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
IMO the article should point out that without knowing the weighting that each synapse has, the connectome could not be used to build a simulation of a working brain. New Thought ( talk) 12:00, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- I'm a neuroscientist who works in this exact area. I added information about what may be needed to simulate, along with a reference. This is a reference to my own work, which is allowed, but should be checked by other editors. LouScheffer ( talk) 17:18, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks - that's a helpful contribution! New Thought ( talk) 12:59, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello @ Boghog: You have been told many times over many years that other editors do not agree to your violations of WP:CITEVAR. Invasive Spices ( talk) 20:25, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
- Shall we return to "author1 AND author2 AND author3 AND author4" style? Boghog ( talk) 20:50, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
While I appreciate that bioRxiv is not peer reviewed, and not in general a reliable source, these two projects (full female adult brain, and male nerve cord) are reliably sourced, just not by the bioRxiv pre-print alone. So I changed the references to the data web sites, where the reader can verify for themselves that the data is really available (seeing the data yourself is even more reliable than a peer-reviewed article stating it's available, in my opinion). I left in the links to the bioRxiv articles, with explicit notation that this is a pre-print. Comments welcome, LouScheffer ( talk) 14:39, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
IMO the article should point out that without knowing the weighting that each synapse has, the connectome could not be used to build a simulation of a working brain. New Thought ( talk) 12:00, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- I'm a neuroscientist who works in this exact area. I added information about what may be needed to simulate, along with a reference. This is a reference to my own work, which is allowed, but should be checked by other editors. LouScheffer ( talk) 17:18, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks - that's a helpful contribution! New Thought ( talk) 12:59, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello @ Boghog: You have been told many times over many years that other editors do not agree to your violations of WP:CITEVAR. Invasive Spices ( talk) 20:25, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
- Shall we return to "author1 AND author2 AND author3 AND author4" style? Boghog ( talk) 20:50, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
While I appreciate that bioRxiv is not peer reviewed, and not in general a reliable source, these two projects (full female adult brain, and male nerve cord) are reliably sourced, just not by the bioRxiv pre-print alone. So I changed the references to the data web sites, where the reader can verify for themselves that the data is really available (seeing the data yourself is even more reliable than a peer-reviewed article stating it's available, in my opinion). I left in the links to the bioRxiv articles, with explicit notation that this is a pre-print. Comments welcome, LouScheffer ( talk) 14:39, 25 July 2023 (UTC)