Apparently there is enough context to identify what this article is talking about. For those of us not so perceptive, which Ghost Busters movie used this as a prop? -- Wtshymanski ( talk) 03:30, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
"Merge and redirect" is what I plan to do unless I see an objection. This article has no context on its own, and next to no content. We shouldn't expect the seeker of knowledge to have to roam all over the Wikipedia collecting enough pocket lint to make a cloak. -- Wtshymanski ( talk) 14:48, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
This article claims these things are "also named silent discharge". I've seen the demonstration at the Deutsches Museum that includes the event depicted by the new picture at Dielectric barrier discharge (two electrodes separated by a large glass plate) and let me tell you, it is anything but silent. The claim of "silent" here needs further explanation, or else it is wrong, or the picture is misapplied. Jeh ( talk) 13:05, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
Apparently there is enough context to identify what this article is talking about. For those of us not so perceptive, which Ghost Busters movie used this as a prop? -- Wtshymanski ( talk) 03:30, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
"Merge and redirect" is what I plan to do unless I see an objection. This article has no context on its own, and next to no content. We shouldn't expect the seeker of knowledge to have to roam all over the Wikipedia collecting enough pocket lint to make a cloak. -- Wtshymanski ( talk) 14:48, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
This article claims these things are "also named silent discharge". I've seen the demonstration at the Deutsches Museum that includes the event depicted by the new picture at Dielectric barrier discharge (two electrodes separated by a large glass plate) and let me tell you, it is anything but silent. The claim of "silent" here needs further explanation, or else it is wrong, or the picture is misapplied. Jeh ( talk) 13:05, 9 December 2010 (UTC)