![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
![]() | A fact from Dravidar Kazhagam appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 20 September 2005. The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
==Untitled Change Dravida kazigzhagram to Dravida kazhagam
It is very clear that some aspects of this article lack neutrality and present a one-sided view, perhaps one influenced by a cited source ("Periyar: Father of the Tamil race"). Particular places where this bias is self-evident include:
There may be more subtle biases e.g. in the unreferenced claim that "Its sharp opposition to religion, especially Brahminical Hinduism, was widely popular." There may be some merit in what is being claimed throughout this article, but many of the areas it covers are sensitive and there are other viewpoints, particularly concerning the conflict in Sri Lanka, that are clearly not being represented here. For this reason I tagged the article as having a POV issue. TheGrappler ( talk) 16:58, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 ( talk) 18:43, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
The following statement under Controversies section has been removed as it is wrongly attributed to Dravidar Kazhagam instead of Dravidar Viduthalai Kazhagam. (Two Different organisation) [1]
But contrary to the original goals, the followers of the organization have degenerated it into focused Anti-Brahminism and hooliganism. [2]
References
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 05:53, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
![]() | A fact from Dravidar Kazhagam appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 20 September 2005. The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
==Untitled Change Dravida kazigzhagram to Dravida kazhagam
It is very clear that some aspects of this article lack neutrality and present a one-sided view, perhaps one influenced by a cited source ("Periyar: Father of the Tamil race"). Particular places where this bias is self-evident include:
There may be more subtle biases e.g. in the unreferenced claim that "Its sharp opposition to religion, especially Brahminical Hinduism, was widely popular." There may be some merit in what is being claimed throughout this article, but many of the areas it covers are sensitive and there are other viewpoints, particularly concerning the conflict in Sri Lanka, that are clearly not being represented here. For this reason I tagged the article as having a POV issue. TheGrappler ( talk) 16:58, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 ( talk) 18:43, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
The following statement under Controversies section has been removed as it is wrongly attributed to Dravidar Kazhagam instead of Dravidar Viduthalai Kazhagam. (Two Different organisation) [1]
But contrary to the original goals, the followers of the organization have degenerated it into focused Anti-Brahminism and hooliganism. [2]
References
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 05:53, 18 June 2022 (UTC)