![]() | Dracophyllum arboreum has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: August 18, 2021. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from Dracophyllum arboreum appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 11 September 2021 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Casliber ( talk · contribs) 23:23, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Okay I'll bite XD....making copyedits as I go (please revert if I inadvertently change the meaning) and jotting queries below...
Cas Liber (
talk ·
contribs)
23:23, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
1. Well written?:
2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
3. Broad in coverage?:
4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
5. Reasonably stable?
6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
Overall:
The result was: promoted by
Theleekycauldron (
talk)
08:18, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Dracophyllum ( talk). Self-nominated at 09:06, 22 August 2021 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall:
Epicgenius (
talk)
14:05, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
![]() | Dracophyllum arboreum has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: August 18, 2021. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from Dracophyllum arboreum appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 11 September 2021 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Casliber ( talk · contribs) 23:23, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Okay I'll bite XD....making copyedits as I go (please revert if I inadvertently change the meaning) and jotting queries below...
Cas Liber (
talk ·
contribs)
23:23, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
1. Well written?:
2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
3. Broad in coverage?:
4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
5. Reasonably stable?
6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
Overall:
The result was: promoted by
Theleekycauldron (
talk)
08:18, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Dracophyllum ( talk). Self-nominated at 09:06, 22 August 2021 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall:
Epicgenius (
talk)
14:05, 23 August 2021 (UTC)