This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Doxbin (darknet) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please see the edit summary of these two edits:
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Doxbin&diff=847643695&oldid=846236822&diffmode=source
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Doxbin&diff=848818171&oldid=848817335&diffmode=source
I am specifically referring to the following words/sentences; emphasis mine:
code-snippets and other stuff.
It is available on the clearweb
However, they won't remove a dox at the first sign of a random complaint from some angry guy.
He told in an interview
I am also unhappy about the addition of an official "URL" in place of the following HTML comment:
<!--I looked around everywhere and found 10 different doxbin addresses, none supported by reliable sources.-->
~ ToBeFree ( talk) 14:59, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
https://bit(dot)ly/3mQJNis doxbin currently is under doxbin(dot)to, the doxbin(dot)org domain should be back up in a few days. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.49.112.248 ( talk) 17:05, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi Vastcast. Sorry, but I had to undo the changes you made (for now). Wikipedia articles can only be based on what's written in reliable, independent sources. It does look like there's a new/revived Doxbin (I've seen mention of it several times now), but we'd need reliable sources to report on it before updating it here (and then cite those sources in the article). Especially in the world of Tor/onion sites, there are so many examples of hijacking, use of the same name, etc., so we wait until things get coverage by publications we can count on to do some fact-checking, etc. Do we have good documentation about whether this is the same site as the original, same operators, or just the same name? — Rhododendrites talk \\ 18:44, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
For now, can this article be for details only relating to the now defunct onion doxbin site? The doxbin[dot]com owners have specified that the sites are not linked. Perhaps a new article should be made for the new clearnet doxbin site? M4sugared ( talk) 01:29, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
"Doxbin" is a pastebin with community members who might be "far-right"; however, Doxbin is not far-right itself. Also there is much irrelevant info with questionable sources that I deleted. And as stated numerous times before, this wiki was meant to be about the hidden service with other owners. Doxbin.com has no affiliation with the shut-down version. The article now has (unreliable) info of BOTH the Onion service and the clearnet service; the info isn't even specifying about which service it's about. 84.196.39.52 ( talk) 18:38, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Doxbin (darknet) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please see the edit summary of these two edits:
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Doxbin&diff=847643695&oldid=846236822&diffmode=source
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Doxbin&diff=848818171&oldid=848817335&diffmode=source
I am specifically referring to the following words/sentences; emphasis mine:
code-snippets and other stuff.
It is available on the clearweb
However, they won't remove a dox at the first sign of a random complaint from some angry guy.
He told in an interview
I am also unhappy about the addition of an official "URL" in place of the following HTML comment:
<!--I looked around everywhere and found 10 different doxbin addresses, none supported by reliable sources.-->
~ ToBeFree ( talk) 14:59, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
https://bit(dot)ly/3mQJNis doxbin currently is under doxbin(dot)to, the doxbin(dot)org domain should be back up in a few days. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.49.112.248 ( talk) 17:05, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi Vastcast. Sorry, but I had to undo the changes you made (for now). Wikipedia articles can only be based on what's written in reliable, independent sources. It does look like there's a new/revived Doxbin (I've seen mention of it several times now), but we'd need reliable sources to report on it before updating it here (and then cite those sources in the article). Especially in the world of Tor/onion sites, there are so many examples of hijacking, use of the same name, etc., so we wait until things get coverage by publications we can count on to do some fact-checking, etc. Do we have good documentation about whether this is the same site as the original, same operators, or just the same name? — Rhododendrites talk \\ 18:44, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
For now, can this article be for details only relating to the now defunct onion doxbin site? The doxbin[dot]com owners have specified that the sites are not linked. Perhaps a new article should be made for the new clearnet doxbin site? M4sugared ( talk) 01:29, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
"Doxbin" is a pastebin with community members who might be "far-right"; however, Doxbin is not far-right itself. Also there is much irrelevant info with questionable sources that I deleted. And as stated numerous times before, this wiki was meant to be about the hidden service with other owners. Doxbin.com has no affiliation with the shut-down version. The article now has (unreliable) info of BOTH the Onion service and the clearnet service; the info isn't even specifying about which service it's about. 84.196.39.52 ( talk) 18:38, 2 December 2022 (UTC)