This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles This article was accepted from this draft on 12 March 2019 by reviewer Legacypac ( talk · contribs). Economics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Environment Low‑importance This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. International development Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject International development, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of international development, including such areas as appropriate technology, microfinance and social issues, on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International developmentWikipedia:WikiProject International developmentTemplate:WikiProject International developmentInternational development articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Surely we can find more sources criticising the concept than a single source, especially for what's definitely a heterodox view of economics. Eldomtom2 ( talk) 15:50, 18 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Surely we can find someone so lazy as to criticize the presentation who has a literate response with examples! 98.215.221.56 ( talk) 20:53, 4 September 2023 (UTC) reply

If there are such sources then present them. KetchupSalt ( talk) 17:19, 9 October 2023 (UTC) reply

In absence of any real discussion, I'll remove the POV banner according to Template:POV#When_to_remove. Nuretok ( talk) 19:42, 2 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Restoring the tag. Here are some articles discussing criticisms of, making criticisms of, or responding to criticisms of doughnut economics:

• https://time.com/5930093/amsterdam-doughnut-economics
• https://braveneweurope.com/doughnut-economics-seven-ways-to-think-like-a-21st-century-economist-by-kate-raworth
• https://www.thealternative.org.uk/dailyalternative/2018/6/28/raworth-doughnuts-critics
• https://fee.org/articles/theres-a-hole-in-the-middle-of-doughnut-economics/
• https://jacobin.com/2021/09/doughnut-economics-raworth-amsterdam-capitalism-socialism
• https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/jun/08/the-planets-economist-has-kate-raworth-found-a-model-for-sustainable-living
• https://ejpe.org/journal/article/download/412/289/909
• https://verysmalldreams.com/academic/2019/12/07/doughnut-economics.html
• https://cbey.yale.edu/sites/default/files/Book%20Review%20-%20Doughnut%20Economics.pdf
• https://braveneweurope.com/doughnut-economics-seven-ways-to-think-like-a-21st-century-economist-by-kate-raworth
• https://mappingignorance.org/2022/12/05/the-fake-sweetness-of-doughnut-economics/

Of course these criticise it from different angles (some from the left, some from the right), and for different reasons, and a lot of these are primary sources. But I think my point that there is a great deal of opposition to the concept, which the article should reflect, is made.-- Eldomtom2 ( talk) 19:42, 2 February 2024 (UTC) reply