Dot Cotton has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The link for bingo goes to a disambig page. Being as this is a British based series, I assume that it means Housie. If not, the link should go to Bingo (US). Please do not just change it back to Bingo, that is an incorrect link. Warhorus 17:44, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
I though the article seemed a bit incomplete so i decided to add to the content and detail. :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sparhelda ( talk • contribs)
The storylines need to be padded out, especially from the early days - pre-1993. There is way too much about Pauline's death and Tomas, it needs to be trimmed down. I'm also not keen on the AlexWilkes-style mulitple headings... anyone agree? I'm reading the Baffled Heart book at the moment, so I'll add more info to the early life section as and when... - Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 16:29, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Well thats the Tomas storyline done now. Maybe we could keep it about the same then? I mean, this article could do with some more detail i think. -- Sparhelda 19:58, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
I've cut down "Pauline's death" significantly. There was a lot of detail about other characters, which I removed or condensed. We need to keep the article as focused on Dot as possible. If someone wants to read details about other characters, they can go to their pages. Gungadin 20:44, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Image:Vlcsnap-552182.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 23:28, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Image:Dotðel.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 07:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Image:Dot&jim0.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 07:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Image:Dot Cotton (television character).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 07:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
When this article get OOU perspective, something like this can be used as a source:
SPOILER ALERT EastEnders' Dot Branning weeps her heart out
anemone│
projectors 00:08, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Here's another;
June Brown: Performance art at the heart of Albert Square. I can't believe this article doesn't have any OOU sections yet!
anemone│
projectors 13:38, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
I'm including my ideas, as I think this article could be a good collaboration for the EE project, and a potential FA candidate perhaps, in the very distant future :) Please add anything you think may be important.
Sections to include:
*Relationship with Nick
*Frienships
*Jim
*Charlie
*1993 exit and 1997 return
GunGagdin
Moan 15:48, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
"helped her mother kill her husband as he abused her" - Was this bit mentioned on-screen ever? I dont recall hearing about this before. GunGagdin Moan 12:34, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
I see there's no mention of her leaving for Calendar Girls other than in the lead. I wanted to add a quote from Diederick Santer: "there were quite a few Dot stories lined up but June wanted time off to do Calendar Girls. Those stories will play out in the New Year." The reference is the same as the one I added with the name "santer2009". AnemoneProjectors ( talk) 18:41, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
There is, however, a GA backlog drive commencing next month (April), so if we do the changes and resubmit it with luck it shouldn't take another 3 months to face review. ✽ Juniper§ Liege (TALK) 05:47, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Dot's hypochondria is touched upon in the article, I'm not sure if this source adds anything to it... Anemone Projectors 10:59, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
More reviews:
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: 5 albert square ( talk) 23:13, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
OK, I have a few suggestions to make for improving the article before it passes/fails GA.
It mentions in the article "To Dot's dismay, Dotty is retrieved by her mother following various devious deeds." What "various devious deeds" are these? What did Dotty do? Some expansion (though not much) would be good on this. Done GunGagdin Moan 15:08, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
Reference 29 needs replacing, when I click on the link it says that the user has deleted their account so the information is no longer there. Done GunGagdin Moan 15:01, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
Reference 95 needs replacing, it no longer seems to talk about smoking.
Reference 73 - can we get a reliable source to confirm this? At the minute reference 71 is IMDB, as WP:RS states, IMDB is classed as a self-published source and is largely not acceptable.{{done}] removed cos we cant find refs GunGagdin Moan 20:57, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Reference 67 needs replacing as it now directs to a BBC Mobile page. Done GunGagdin Moan 15:16, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
References 58, 57 Done removed the urls GunGagdin Moan 01:05, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
55 all need replacing as all are now dead links.
Reference 54 needs replacing, it says that the book can no longer be located there. Done removed the link, as it's a book and so doesnt really need the google books link as it's fine to have it as just an offline ref GunGagdin Moan 15:11, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
I'll check back to this in a day or two's time and review it again to give people the chance to work on it.-- 5 albert square ( talk) 23:13, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
The wayback machine caches the EE website, have you got the old links for these refs? PS, what's you thoughts re the images because, dunno if u noticed, but the page has been tagged and they all have been put up for deletion. I deleted some, kept others; nominating user isnt bothering to engage with my changes to the rationales. Any feedback? GunGagdin Moan 19:11, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Is a dead link a definite fail for GA then? It seems so silly that they are making it that way. just because the info is no longer on a published site online, that it somehow doesnt count for inclusion, because when it was included it was published. Can we just source to the publisher without linking the URL? GunGagdin Moan 00:55, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
This could (should) be added to popular culture but all I can find is Unreality Shout which isn't a really reliable source [1] – Anemone Projectors– 14:40, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
"The role also resulted in a 'Best Comedy Performance' nomination at the 1999 British Soap Awards,[73] 'Most Popular Actress' nominations in the 2001[73] and 2005[74] National Television Awards, an 'Outstanding Serial Drama Performance' nomination at the 2008 NTAs,[73]"
If anyone can help with refs for these award nominations, would be much appreciated. Until then am leaving here so it can be replaced into reception section. GunGagdin Moan 20:59, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
A person called Gungadin just deleted a hours work on Dot Branning which took forever and had some really important stuff in it as i noticed that in the whole document there was NOTHING about Bradley in it at all it was like he hadnt existed. All the work i did was wiped yeah i can see some of it but not other parts which were very important and relevant to her storyline. Please think about wiping stuff beofre you actually do it.-- MayhemMario ( talk) 21:16, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
but now in the whole articl there is nothing about brdaley, im sorry i will delete this!-- MayhemMario ( talk) 21:28, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
sorry for deleting the dot branning thing i see where your'e coming from though i deletd them obviously for a point, a personal point.-- MayhemMario ( talk) 18:07, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Wheer would this link go? [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by MayhemMario ( talk • contribs) 20:25, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
what do you mean?-- MayhemMario ( talk) 18:09, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Digital Spy interview just out - also has no current home. As this article is Gungadin's baby, maybe she'll see if any of it is worth adding a new section for. There's also personality stuff, maybe the stuff about Edward could go in relationships?? – Anemone Projectors– 00:10, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Hey dont no if this counts but what about the new game on the EE website, Suspicous Spoilers? I mean just look [ [2]]. What do you think? Mayhem Mario 16:50, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
A IP added 'Gwen' as her aunt, was it mentioned in an episode?! I reverted it, but was I right?! Mayhem Mario 17:10, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
As per this previous discussion, it was generally agreed that this article name should be changed to Dot Cotton. Can someone do this? Bleaney ( talk) 20:26, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
2 people and no psychological gratification. 82.32.200.253 ( talk) 02:17, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 4 external links on
Dot Cotton. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 02:32, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 5 external links on
Dot Cotton. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 05:40, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Dot Cotton. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 04:05, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Dot Cotton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:17, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
I think it's safe to say she's leaving, as the source given in the article when it says "she temporarly departed again on March 1, 2019" does mention this will be her last year. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.100.240.209 ( talk) 06:43, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Detective Inspector Matthew "Dot" Cottan is a character in Line of Duty. I'm wondering whether it is worth adding a hatnote from Dot Cotton to link to the Line of Duty article? Many people would know him as Dot Cottan but may not be aware of the different spelling. On the other hand, he doesn't seem notable enough to have an article of his own so it is questionable as to how many people would be searching for him specifically. -- Jameboy ( talk) 19:12, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Dot Cotton has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The link for bingo goes to a disambig page. Being as this is a British based series, I assume that it means Housie. If not, the link should go to Bingo (US). Please do not just change it back to Bingo, that is an incorrect link. Warhorus 17:44, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
I though the article seemed a bit incomplete so i decided to add to the content and detail. :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sparhelda ( talk • contribs)
The storylines need to be padded out, especially from the early days - pre-1993. There is way too much about Pauline's death and Tomas, it needs to be trimmed down. I'm also not keen on the AlexWilkes-style mulitple headings... anyone agree? I'm reading the Baffled Heart book at the moment, so I'll add more info to the early life section as and when... - Trampikey( talk)( contribs) 16:29, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Well thats the Tomas storyline done now. Maybe we could keep it about the same then? I mean, this article could do with some more detail i think. -- Sparhelda 19:58, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
I've cut down "Pauline's death" significantly. There was a lot of detail about other characters, which I removed or condensed. We need to keep the article as focused on Dot as possible. If someone wants to read details about other characters, they can go to their pages. Gungadin 20:44, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Image:Vlcsnap-552182.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 23:28, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Image:Dotðel.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 07:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Image:Dot&jim0.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 07:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Image:Dot Cotton (television character).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 07:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
When this article get OOU perspective, something like this can be used as a source:
SPOILER ALERT EastEnders' Dot Branning weeps her heart out
anemone│
projectors 00:08, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Here's another;
June Brown: Performance art at the heart of Albert Square. I can't believe this article doesn't have any OOU sections yet!
anemone│
projectors 13:38, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
I'm including my ideas, as I think this article could be a good collaboration for the EE project, and a potential FA candidate perhaps, in the very distant future :) Please add anything you think may be important.
Sections to include:
*Relationship with Nick
*Frienships
*Jim
*Charlie
*1993 exit and 1997 return
GunGagdin
Moan 15:48, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
"helped her mother kill her husband as he abused her" - Was this bit mentioned on-screen ever? I dont recall hearing about this before. GunGagdin Moan 12:34, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
I see there's no mention of her leaving for Calendar Girls other than in the lead. I wanted to add a quote from Diederick Santer: "there were quite a few Dot stories lined up but June wanted time off to do Calendar Girls. Those stories will play out in the New Year." The reference is the same as the one I added with the name "santer2009". AnemoneProjectors ( talk) 18:41, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
There is, however, a GA backlog drive commencing next month (April), so if we do the changes and resubmit it with luck it shouldn't take another 3 months to face review. ✽ Juniper§ Liege (TALK) 05:47, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Dot's hypochondria is touched upon in the article, I'm not sure if this source adds anything to it... Anemone Projectors 10:59, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
More reviews:
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: 5 albert square ( talk) 23:13, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
OK, I have a few suggestions to make for improving the article before it passes/fails GA.
It mentions in the article "To Dot's dismay, Dotty is retrieved by her mother following various devious deeds." What "various devious deeds" are these? What did Dotty do? Some expansion (though not much) would be good on this. Done GunGagdin Moan 15:08, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
Reference 29 needs replacing, when I click on the link it says that the user has deleted their account so the information is no longer there. Done GunGagdin Moan 15:01, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
Reference 95 needs replacing, it no longer seems to talk about smoking.
Reference 73 - can we get a reliable source to confirm this? At the minute reference 71 is IMDB, as WP:RS states, IMDB is classed as a self-published source and is largely not acceptable.{{done}] removed cos we cant find refs GunGagdin Moan 20:57, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Reference 67 needs replacing as it now directs to a BBC Mobile page. Done GunGagdin Moan 15:16, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
References 58, 57 Done removed the urls GunGagdin Moan 01:05, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
55 all need replacing as all are now dead links.
Reference 54 needs replacing, it says that the book can no longer be located there. Done removed the link, as it's a book and so doesnt really need the google books link as it's fine to have it as just an offline ref GunGagdin Moan 15:11, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
I'll check back to this in a day or two's time and review it again to give people the chance to work on it.-- 5 albert square ( talk) 23:13, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
The wayback machine caches the EE website, have you got the old links for these refs? PS, what's you thoughts re the images because, dunno if u noticed, but the page has been tagged and they all have been put up for deletion. I deleted some, kept others; nominating user isnt bothering to engage with my changes to the rationales. Any feedback? GunGagdin Moan 19:11, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Is a dead link a definite fail for GA then? It seems so silly that they are making it that way. just because the info is no longer on a published site online, that it somehow doesnt count for inclusion, because when it was included it was published. Can we just source to the publisher without linking the URL? GunGagdin Moan 00:55, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
This could (should) be added to popular culture but all I can find is Unreality Shout which isn't a really reliable source [1] – Anemone Projectors– 14:40, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
"The role also resulted in a 'Best Comedy Performance' nomination at the 1999 British Soap Awards,[73] 'Most Popular Actress' nominations in the 2001[73] and 2005[74] National Television Awards, an 'Outstanding Serial Drama Performance' nomination at the 2008 NTAs,[73]"
If anyone can help with refs for these award nominations, would be much appreciated. Until then am leaving here so it can be replaced into reception section. GunGagdin Moan 20:59, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
A person called Gungadin just deleted a hours work on Dot Branning which took forever and had some really important stuff in it as i noticed that in the whole document there was NOTHING about Bradley in it at all it was like he hadnt existed. All the work i did was wiped yeah i can see some of it but not other parts which were very important and relevant to her storyline. Please think about wiping stuff beofre you actually do it.-- MayhemMario ( talk) 21:16, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
but now in the whole articl there is nothing about brdaley, im sorry i will delete this!-- MayhemMario ( talk) 21:28, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
sorry for deleting the dot branning thing i see where your'e coming from though i deletd them obviously for a point, a personal point.-- MayhemMario ( talk) 18:07, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Wheer would this link go? [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by MayhemMario ( talk • contribs) 20:25, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
what do you mean?-- MayhemMario ( talk) 18:09, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Digital Spy interview just out - also has no current home. As this article is Gungadin's baby, maybe she'll see if any of it is worth adding a new section for. There's also personality stuff, maybe the stuff about Edward could go in relationships?? – Anemone Projectors– 00:10, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Hey dont no if this counts but what about the new game on the EE website, Suspicous Spoilers? I mean just look [ [2]]. What do you think? Mayhem Mario 16:50, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
A IP added 'Gwen' as her aunt, was it mentioned in an episode?! I reverted it, but was I right?! Mayhem Mario 17:10, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
As per this previous discussion, it was generally agreed that this article name should be changed to Dot Cotton. Can someone do this? Bleaney ( talk) 20:26, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
2 people and no psychological gratification. 82.32.200.253 ( talk) 02:17, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 4 external links on
Dot Cotton. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 02:32, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 5 external links on
Dot Cotton. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 05:40, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Dot Cotton. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 04:05, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Dot Cotton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:17, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
I think it's safe to say she's leaving, as the source given in the article when it says "she temporarly departed again on March 1, 2019" does mention this will be her last year. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.100.240.209 ( talk) 06:43, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Detective Inspector Matthew "Dot" Cottan is a character in Line of Duty. I'm wondering whether it is worth adding a hatnote from Dot Cotton to link to the Line of Duty article? Many people would know him as Dot Cottan but may not be aware of the different spelling. On the other hand, he doesn't seem notable enough to have an article of his own so it is questionable as to how many people would be searching for him specifically. -- Jameboy ( talk) 19:12, 7 October 2020 (UTC)