From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2016 Revision

@ Jonkerz:, thought I'd ping you for this one. Major taxonomic changes have occurred; 28 genera (27 extant and 1 extinct) are now recognized, an increase from 20 in the previous classification scheme. Two new genera are proposed, 8 are removed from synonymy and 7 are placed in synonymy. Source is found here. Burklemore1 ( talk) 14:22, 20 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Oh noooo not again! :) thanks for the ping btw, Burklemore1. I haven't kept up with the latest taxonomy, but this is something we must fix. I'll add it to the todo. jonkerztalk 05:47, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply
No worries, the subfamilies seem to be having a major revamp or something. I have updated the genera list in accordance to the changes though. :) Burklemore1 ( talk) 05:53, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

I've updated the main article [1]. Not done yet:

jonkerztalk 03:48, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2016 Revision

@ Jonkerz:, thought I'd ping you for this one. Major taxonomic changes have occurred; 28 genera (27 extant and 1 extinct) are now recognized, an increase from 20 in the previous classification scheme. Two new genera are proposed, 8 are removed from synonymy and 7 are placed in synonymy. Source is found here. Burklemore1 ( talk) 14:22, 20 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Oh noooo not again! :) thanks for the ping btw, Burklemore1. I haven't kept up with the latest taxonomy, but this is something we must fix. I'll add it to the todo. jonkerztalk 05:47, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply
No worries, the subfamilies seem to be having a major revamp or something. I have updated the genera list in accordance to the changes though. :) Burklemore1 ( talk) 05:53, 18 October 2016 (UTC) reply

I've updated the main article [1]. Not done yet:

jonkerztalk 03:48, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook