This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I created a disambig page for DCML. The other links there do not seem that notable at all (possibly dead markup language and a disney mailing list) vs. the neuro pathway. Therefore, I suggest redirecting the DCML page to here.-- Xris0 ( talk) 21:53, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
From Posterior column-medial lemniscus pathway to dorsal column-medial lemniscus pathway
The problem is the page is already a re-direct page.
The reason for the move is quite clear. The dorsal column-medial lemniscus pathway is in standard usage in texts such as Grey's Anatomy and most neuroanatomy texts. Mizrahi58 ( talk) 15:53, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
It is very confusing to have all these article separated when they can be much more easily presented as parts of the overall tract to which they belong (DCML or PCML). This:
As above Tom (LT) ( talk) 07:44, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
As above Tom (LT) ( talk) 07:44, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
As above Tom (LT) ( talk) 07:44, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
dorsal column nuclei also include their tracts. My anatomy is a bit rusty, but this doesn't seem at all obvious: somata versus axons; grey versus white. Other than that statement, I don't think that the
dorsal column nuclei page includes them(it does properly link to the fasciculi pages), and believe that the more straightforward merge proposed by Tom (LT) is a better solution. Klbrain ( talk) 17:33, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
proposal to merge the fasciculi in to their respective nuclei does have consensus support. The result would also be that the columns and fasciculi would direct to different pages, which seems odd. Reconsider? As I'm involved, I can't really change the conclusion myself. Klbrain ( talk) 11:02, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Iztwoz Yes, I understand your concerns. I had a lot of difficulty in figuring out who supported/opposed what as the discussions really aren't organized in an easy to read way. By the way, thank you for summarizing the discussion above, it really helps. I'll change my close to reflect that. Mgasparin ( talk) 03:59, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasu ă! 04:59, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
Posterior columnâmedial lemniscus pathway â
Dorsal columnâmedial lemniscus pathway â DCML (when spelled out in full) is by far the more common name in discourse, literature (
[1]), textbooks. We should be using that here.
Tom (LT) (
talk)
07:52, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Although I don't usually like the use of acronyms, I think that the use of the acronym for this pathway (DCML or PCML) may actually improve readability. Thoughts of other editors? -- Tom (LT) ( talk) 03:21, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Have removed â Consider: Corona radiata --> 3 1 2 Brodmann. [1] â without anything further it means nothing. ?-- Iztwoz ( talk) 21:17, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
References
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I created a disambig page for DCML. The other links there do not seem that notable at all (possibly dead markup language and a disney mailing list) vs. the neuro pathway. Therefore, I suggest redirecting the DCML page to here.-- Xris0 ( talk) 21:53, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
From Posterior column-medial lemniscus pathway to dorsal column-medial lemniscus pathway
The problem is the page is already a re-direct page.
The reason for the move is quite clear. The dorsal column-medial lemniscus pathway is in standard usage in texts such as Grey's Anatomy and most neuroanatomy texts. Mizrahi58 ( talk) 15:53, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
It is very confusing to have all these article separated when they can be much more easily presented as parts of the overall tract to which they belong (DCML or PCML). This:
As above Tom (LT) ( talk) 07:44, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
As above Tom (LT) ( talk) 07:44, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
As above Tom (LT) ( talk) 07:44, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
dorsal column nuclei also include their tracts. My anatomy is a bit rusty, but this doesn't seem at all obvious: somata versus axons; grey versus white. Other than that statement, I don't think that the
dorsal column nuclei page includes them(it does properly link to the fasciculi pages), and believe that the more straightforward merge proposed by Tom (LT) is a better solution. Klbrain ( talk) 17:33, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
proposal to merge the fasciculi in to their respective nuclei does have consensus support. The result would also be that the columns and fasciculi would direct to different pages, which seems odd. Reconsider? As I'm involved, I can't really change the conclusion myself. Klbrain ( talk) 11:02, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Iztwoz Yes, I understand your concerns. I had a lot of difficulty in figuring out who supported/opposed what as the discussions really aren't organized in an easy to read way. By the way, thank you for summarizing the discussion above, it really helps. I'll change my close to reflect that. Mgasparin ( talk) 03:59, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasu ă! 04:59, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
Posterior columnâmedial lemniscus pathway â
Dorsal columnâmedial lemniscus pathway â DCML (when spelled out in full) is by far the more common name in discourse, literature (
[1]), textbooks. We should be using that here.
Tom (LT) (
talk)
07:52, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Although I don't usually like the use of acronyms, I think that the use of the acronym for this pathway (DCML or PCML) may actually improve readability. Thoughts of other editors? -- Tom (LT) ( talk) 03:21, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Have removed â Consider: Corona radiata --> 3 1 2 Brodmann. [1] â without anything further it means nothing. ?-- Iztwoz ( talk) 21:17, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
References