This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article has been
automatically rated by a
bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to
Chicago or the
Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
There's a nice photo on p.39 of "Through Their Eyes", the catalog of the current exhibition at the
Wheelwright Museum. If someone will scan it, I'll do the paperwork for fair use in our article. Nice show, btw. Cheers,
Pete Tillman (
talk)
04:50, 18 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Equitable solution? The info is not important? This user's objectivity flutters like a hummingbird and if the truth be known is dependent upon our editing disputes in other articles.
Amerindianarts (
talk)
19:10, 19 May 2009 (UTC)reply
I think anyone reading this article who craves more information is capable of using Google to find the other 10K+ articles about Dorothy Dunn. -
Uyvsdi (
talk)
20:39, 19 May 2009 (UTC)Uyvsdireply
I am unable to understand U's position. You have edit warred repeatedly to a version that you now assert is not an improvement, which seems entirely pointless and indeed a net negative. Meanwhile A has for reasons I don't understand removed the link in question
[2]William M. Connolley (
talk)
20:47, 19 May 2009 (UTC)reply
I removed it because I had restored it and don't want the accusations of a conflict of interests now or in the future. I don't want to argue about it and I don't want a link to a copyvio. The "equitable solution" is for U to restore it to its original version and end the argument.
Amerindianarts (
talk)
21:43, 19 May 2009 (UTC)reply
The website is operated by another web design company. They were very understanding and I don't think they are pirates. The problem is copyright violations by ezinearticles and their mirror sites. We had virtual fisticuffs a couple of years ago over copyright violations. This is an example of what happens to sites who don't comply with copyrights.
http://www.cause-celebre.com/dorothy-dunn-and--primitive--art.html
Well
Uyvsdi, it appears that thus far the consensus is against your removal of the link. Are you going to do the equitable thing and make another one of your "substantial contributions" by restoring your edit, or are you going to sit on your hands and continue to be contrary?
Amerindianarts (
talk)
02:26, 21 May 2009 (UTC)reply
When reading this article in the past, I found a couple of links for users to go to if they wanted to check up Wikipedia's article or find more information. I think the links were useful, but I never realized anyone would want to make a tempest in a teapot out of them. I find it useful for our articles to link to other websites, thus avoiding the need to break off some research to conduct a websearch.
Stepp-Wulf (
talk)
00:58, 22 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Dunn in California
I came here to read more about Dunn in California, currently there is not much about that here. Adding a note here incase anyone wants to further develop about her later life.
Joojay (
talk)
22:10, 28 December 2021 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article has been
automatically rated by a
bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to
Chicago or the
Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
There's a nice photo on p.39 of "Through Their Eyes", the catalog of the current exhibition at the
Wheelwright Museum. If someone will scan it, I'll do the paperwork for fair use in our article. Nice show, btw. Cheers,
Pete Tillman (
talk)
04:50, 18 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Equitable solution? The info is not important? This user's objectivity flutters like a hummingbird and if the truth be known is dependent upon our editing disputes in other articles.
Amerindianarts (
talk)
19:10, 19 May 2009 (UTC)reply
I think anyone reading this article who craves more information is capable of using Google to find the other 10K+ articles about Dorothy Dunn. -
Uyvsdi (
talk)
20:39, 19 May 2009 (UTC)Uyvsdireply
I am unable to understand U's position. You have edit warred repeatedly to a version that you now assert is not an improvement, which seems entirely pointless and indeed a net negative. Meanwhile A has for reasons I don't understand removed the link in question
[2]William M. Connolley (
talk)
20:47, 19 May 2009 (UTC)reply
I removed it because I had restored it and don't want the accusations of a conflict of interests now or in the future. I don't want to argue about it and I don't want a link to a copyvio. The "equitable solution" is for U to restore it to its original version and end the argument.
Amerindianarts (
talk)
21:43, 19 May 2009 (UTC)reply
The website is operated by another web design company. They were very understanding and I don't think they are pirates. The problem is copyright violations by ezinearticles and their mirror sites. We had virtual fisticuffs a couple of years ago over copyright violations. This is an example of what happens to sites who don't comply with copyrights.
http://www.cause-celebre.com/dorothy-dunn-and--primitive--art.html
Well
Uyvsdi, it appears that thus far the consensus is against your removal of the link. Are you going to do the equitable thing and make another one of your "substantial contributions" by restoring your edit, or are you going to sit on your hands and continue to be contrary?
Amerindianarts (
talk)
02:26, 21 May 2009 (UTC)reply
When reading this article in the past, I found a couple of links for users to go to if they wanted to check up Wikipedia's article or find more information. I think the links were useful, but I never realized anyone would want to make a tempest in a teapot out of them. I find it useful for our articles to link to other websites, thus avoiding the need to break off some research to conduct a websearch.
Stepp-Wulf (
talk)
00:58, 22 May 2009 (UTC)reply
Dunn in California
I came here to read more about Dunn in California, currently there is not much about that here. Adding a note here incase anyone wants to further develop about her later life.
Joojay (
talk)
22:10, 28 December 2021 (UTC)reply