![]() |
Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
![]() | This article was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Donkey punch films do exist, as this something awful review can demonstrate.
http://www.somethingawful.com/d/horrors-of-porn/donkey-punch.php http://www.iafd.com/title.rme/title=Donkey+Punch/year=2005/Donkey-Punch.htm
I will use the link from iafd as a citation that it has become a real 'theme' in porn movies?
Does this qualify it as being removed from the sexual urban legends? Verdafolio 14:15, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
The Donkey Punch is still an urban legend. The Donkey Punch is supposed to make the recipient tighten their hole, thus making sex more pleasurable for the dealer of the punch. The Donkey Punch movies shows girls getting punched in the back of their heads, but does not prove that it makes the sex more pleasurable. On the contrary, a punch to the back of the head would only knock a girl unconscious, put her into a coma, or kill her, making her hole very loose and having the exact opposite of the intended effect. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Atmaweapon74 ( talk • contribs) 20:21, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Someone needs to fix this article. It clearly states that Gia Paloma is the first recipient of the donkey punch on a professional porn movie in Guttermouths 30. THIS STATEMENT IS COMPLETELY A LIE. Gia is never struck, nor is there any violence at all in Guttermouths 30. This false information has been cut and pasted from this wikipedia site to numerous sites across the internet, spreading the lie. SOMEONE MUST FIX THIS. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Atmaweapon74 ( talk • contribs) 20:29, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
How can this POSSIBLY be an 'urban legend'..? It's like that article that got removed about Gerbiling, of course it exists, I've seen both Gerbiling and the Donkey Punch in videos, and isn't it quite obvious that if a person is hit, unexpectedly, by suprise, they will tighten their ass..? TigerTails ( talk) 21:54, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/donkey-punch/
This link gives a different definition to the term. -- 24.57.221.117 ( talk) 01:24, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
I find the reference to male anal rape in prisons in theis section quite offensive. Prison rape, despite what the mainstream media would like people to believe, is not funny, and shouldn't be used to make a somewhat meretricious point about rape as a deterrent. People are sent to prison for punishment, not to be raped for punishment. ▫ Urbane Legend chinwag 00:09, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Technically people are being sent to prison to rehabilitate, not for punishment; if it was for punishment alone there are other more effective ways. 94.69.178.230 ( talk) 22:00, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
I think it should be stated near the beginning of the article that, when used, the donkey punch is almost exclusively executed during or just before the orgasm of the penetrating partner. I may be mistaken and I haven't found any sources to cite. Veecort ( talk) 13:26, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Okay, I found a source kinda sorta from Fox news. It is not very good but I am sure there are more out there. Veecort ( talk) 13:39, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
I added it to the end of the first paragraph. Also, I first learned about donkey punching from reading the Dan Savage article and he may have stated therein that it is executed just before orgasm. The first time I ever saw anything like it though was the scene in Oz, but I thought Cutler was just being an asshole. As soon as I read the article I understood that what I had seen years before was in fact a form of donkey punch. Veecort ( talk) 14:13, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Maybe, just maybe, correctly defined, a donkey punch is to the kidney area, or not; I don't know. Because I trust Dan Savage I will believe that it is a rabbit punch and not a kidney punch. But that leaves me wondering about the definition in the link above and also the scene from Oz. The definition from the link above is supposedly from a magazine called Popbitch. I believe it goes without saying that this is serious business and we need to clarify this kidney versus rabbit thing sooner rather than later. I am all over it but I am not an authority on the matter. Veecort ( talk) 22:16, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Is this a joke page? It has references to Urban Dictionary for crying out loud. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Poposhka ( talk • contribs) 02:14, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
AKE??? WTF? Are you kidding me???? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.99.23.49 ( talk) 08:47, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Does File:Donkey punch.jpg provide a clear or ambiguous illustration of the subject of the article (i.e., should it be kept or removed)? -- Black Falcon ( talk) 00:43, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
Just want to say that the picture with this article is HILARIOUS!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.63.24.93 ( talk) 02:51, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
As this act is probably apocryphal and possibly lethal, I would suggest the current picture is uncessary and inappropriate and should therefore be removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.110.59.80 ( talk) 18:27, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:TTSGA.gif, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests September 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 16:34, 18 September 2011 (UTC) |
The picture is blatantly sexist and offensive. The fact that it seems amusing and benign to some participants of this discussion gives even more cause for concern. That it seems to portray violence towards women in a way that can be perceived as lighthearted and funny, encourages violence against women by normalizing it. Furthermore, the heteronormative view of sex excludes homosexual relationships and people. The fact that Wikipedia is founded on open source philosophy gives even more reason to remove the picture: in this portrayal of sex, LGBTQA people are excluded, women are victimized, and the Wikipedia space ceases to be democratic, instead becoming a male-dominated and hetero-dominated domain. The picture is violent and should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.110.98.8 ( talk) 22:28, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
This site looks more and more like encylopediadramatica every day! How long do you suppose it will be before Wikipedia has an offended page and an article on goatse? Oh wait you already have one of the two http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goatse also kudos for the picture it really made me smile — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.90.65.235 ( talk) 04:05, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
I have put the comments in chronological order. I assume no editor would ever intentionally slight you for your opinion. However, a coordinated attempt to adjust a Wikipedia article is something that established editors will not appreciate. The image is thought provoking. I am sure we can use plenty of other descriptive phrases for it. But its use not meant to me funny. It is not meant to be lewd. It is meant to illustrate a topic that is already "inappropriate". Your input is appreciated and the image is not guaranteed. But please do not assume that it will be removed by throwing a comment or two up every few months from accounts that do not have a record of following the standards on Wikipedia. Keep the snickering to a minimum and appreciate the value of illustrating something that is worthy of notice. Appreciate that an actual photo is not being used. I can get a release on a couple who would love to be shown on Wikipedia in the throws of passion but I ask them to not make an already racy topic that much worse. Your feedback is great but there is a healthy balance right now and continued edit warring and campaigns by certain people to remove the image will not benefit the project. Keep in mind that no one looking up this subject is so innocent that they do not understand sex. Even more importantly, be happy that actual bodies are not being masturbated to while getting viruses. This is meant to be a record of the sum of human knowledge. Human knowledge consists of plenty of sex.07:17, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Oh wow she played the feminist card. Sorry your "degree" in women's studies didn't do anything other than make you better at whining on the internet about stuff that offends you, but a .gif of exactly what this article is about is most certainly not indicative of whatever oppressed view of the world you have. Grow up. 99.35.224.37 ( talk) 05:49, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
the lead says the goal is to create anal tensing, but earlier says that it's "allegedly" used during both anal or vaginal penetration. Does that mean that the vagina also tenses when someone hypothetically does this? Rodaen ( talk) 13:01, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
How was the Jeopardy contestant's answer incorrect? Technically, this term DOES describe a blow to the back of the neck, and it IS named for an animal.
It's not like the guy said "Falcon Punch." Oh, wait-- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.61.156.96 ( talk) 01:14, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
Reading this, I have to wonder if it's a plausible misinterpretation of something else. Cats and skunks are well known for biting the back of the neck to induce ovulation (they also make use of barbed penises, which likewise are not to be recommended!) Actually, even things as far diverged as stingrays engage in copulatory biting. [1] Even humans apparently have some chance of coitus-induced ovulation [2] - though from that source it looks like eroticism, rather than trauma, is what can trigger release of an extra egg and thus twin infants. My guess is that a gentle playful slap, nibble, etc. which is welcomed by the woman and contributes to the sensation of orgasm, should plausibly have some chance of increasing her fertile response. Of course, I still don't have any way right now to go from this to anything that would be acceptable under WP:NOR. Wnt ( talk) 23:29, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:"Donkey punch" (animated).gif, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 23:56, 9 February 2012 (UTC) |
I have removed the animated image from the article for two reasons. It does not aid the reader in understanding the text of the article and is therefore unnecessary. It is a poorly rendered cartoonish animation and as such not appropriate quality for inclusion in any article. The fact that the image is currently up for deletion is irrelevant. Delicious carbuncle ( talk) 05:51, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
It is gratuitous depiction of violence towards women. It is not educational, nor is it necessary in an encyclopedia. An appropriate image would help explain why the myth/hoax is not scientifically sound, which should be the objective of this article. John Vandenberg ( chat) 02:58, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
You know, the idea of illustrating this article is ridiculous. Remember that this is an article about the urban legend and NOT merely about this type of sexual violence. The distinction is important; if the point of the article were to outline this type of abuse, the image could be called pertinent. But that isn't what the article's about; it's about this urban myth. Does the image portray the myth? No, that's impossible; there's no physiological mechanism for a man to get increased pleasure from doing this. So what is this image, then? It's just a drawing of some dude punching a woman in the back of the head. It's as silly and pointless as contributing an image to Vagina dentata. -- JaGa talk 21:09, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
The Wikipedia page was created in July 2004. [3] The earliest reference we have is Dan Savage (December 2004). [4] I've looked through the archives and AFDs, and couldn't find (reliable) sources that pre-dates the Wikipedia page being created. The closest is what appears to be a user generated site with a page created May 14, 2004 [5] Gia Paloma has claimed to have done this; I havent found when she did it (JM Productions 2004 film Guttermouths 30?). There have been a few porn movies which have included this in a scene; would be good to add the dates of them. Here is a September 2004 comic [6] John Vandenberg ( chat) 09:48, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
I've found 2001 user generated entry for the term [11] in a rather short glossary [12]. And a list a list in 2002 which also indicates that kidney or head are interchangeable, and that the desired outcome only occur if the receiving partner is knocked out. :/ John Vandenberg ( chat) 02:32, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
... here. -- J N 466 19:43, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
I see that the picture was deleted, then an article protection was placed. In theory this "does not take sides in the dispute". For those who have not observed censorship WikiGaming, this is how I think things are likely to go. I hope I'm wrong, but we'll see:
I hope I'm wrong here, but I've seen similar things before. Wnt ( talk) 16:42, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
JN466 linked to some video clips at Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:"Donkey punch" (animated).gif - namely [13] and [14] The first of these is pretty clear, though I'm not sure about the second. Provided that we include some appropriate discussion of the scene from the original film, it would be appropriate to upload the first clip as a WP:Fair Use file. We might not need the drawing here after that. Wnt ( talk) 17:52, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
The content of this article concerns me.
Essentially what we have are slang dictionary definitions, a sex columnists opinion and a medical view of the dangers. I feel we are missing a critical piece of the puzzle that lets us actually write a neutral article - and that piece is origins and use in the real world. As fun as the crusade, and counter-crusade, is against the image I feel it is the least of the issues with this article (which has been sly-POV butchered beyond belief). -- Errant ( chat!) 23:25, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
I agree that it should be specified that the outcome rather than the act is fictional. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.121.6.113 ( talk) 04:27, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
I found a donkey punch gif on imgur so I think its a valid source since I saw some imgur cited sources before http://i.imgur.com/Lj7xE.gif
So I think that image should be added to the article -- F_JUNK _DUMP 23:17, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
I've fixed the quotation after the screen cap seen at http://guyspeed.com/jeopardy-contestant-asks-what-is-a-donkey-punch-video/. Didn't think the page merits inclusion in the references (also I don't know how to do that). Hope this is alright. -- 84.63.171.10 ( talk) 21:30, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
The article as currently written incorrectly implies that the idea of the Donkey Punch originated in the 20th century.
This is incorrect, it in fact dates back to at least the eighteenth century, being described at least twice in the Marquis de Sade's The 120 Days of Sodom, although it was not therein referred to by the modern english name "donkey punch" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.121.6.113 ( talk) 23:21, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
The idea that this doesn't work is completely false. There might not be any mechanism by which the anal sphincter contracts simply from a light blow to the head, but if you knock the recipient unconscious or kill them it certainly does work. Gerry Radulovic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.166.48.244 ( talk) 16:11, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
I publish this in this space just hoping not to be deleted by one know-it-all mod. First of all, there're two films called Donkey Punch: the original porn version (2005) and a UK film (2008). There you can see perform a donkey punch, simulated obviously. Second, a form of donkey punch, hair-pulling instead of punching is possible (and not an 'urban legend'). Both have the same purpose. Doing anal sex doggy-style, and just before orgasm, I pull the hair of my partner and ask her to tense up her anus. It's just that simple. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.102.46.146 ( talk) 17:12, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
Cyberbot II has detected links on Donkey punch which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
\blukeisback\.com\b
on the local blacklistIf you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 17:19, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Concerning the audio file associated with this page:
File:Donkeypunch.ogg
...there are bits where the speaker adds parts that are not (and never were) a part of the article (go to 2:22 for an example of this). The audio file should be taken down. -- Wickedjargon ( talk) 05:17, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
i have since removed the file from the article -- Wickedjargon ( talk) 05:17, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Donkey punch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:23, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Donkey punch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:35, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Donkey punch (cocktail) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 07:09, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
![]() | This article was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Donkey punch films do exist, as this something awful review can demonstrate.
http://www.somethingawful.com/d/horrors-of-porn/donkey-punch.php http://www.iafd.com/title.rme/title=Donkey+Punch/year=2005/Donkey-Punch.htm
I will use the link from iafd as a citation that it has become a real 'theme' in porn movies?
Does this qualify it as being removed from the sexual urban legends? Verdafolio 14:15, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
The Donkey Punch is still an urban legend. The Donkey Punch is supposed to make the recipient tighten their hole, thus making sex more pleasurable for the dealer of the punch. The Donkey Punch movies shows girls getting punched in the back of their heads, but does not prove that it makes the sex more pleasurable. On the contrary, a punch to the back of the head would only knock a girl unconscious, put her into a coma, or kill her, making her hole very loose and having the exact opposite of the intended effect. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Atmaweapon74 ( talk • contribs) 20:21, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Someone needs to fix this article. It clearly states that Gia Paloma is the first recipient of the donkey punch on a professional porn movie in Guttermouths 30. THIS STATEMENT IS COMPLETELY A LIE. Gia is never struck, nor is there any violence at all in Guttermouths 30. This false information has been cut and pasted from this wikipedia site to numerous sites across the internet, spreading the lie. SOMEONE MUST FIX THIS. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Atmaweapon74 ( talk • contribs) 20:29, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
How can this POSSIBLY be an 'urban legend'..? It's like that article that got removed about Gerbiling, of course it exists, I've seen both Gerbiling and the Donkey Punch in videos, and isn't it quite obvious that if a person is hit, unexpectedly, by suprise, they will tighten their ass..? TigerTails ( talk) 21:54, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/donkey-punch/
This link gives a different definition to the term. -- 24.57.221.117 ( talk) 01:24, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
I find the reference to male anal rape in prisons in theis section quite offensive. Prison rape, despite what the mainstream media would like people to believe, is not funny, and shouldn't be used to make a somewhat meretricious point about rape as a deterrent. People are sent to prison for punishment, not to be raped for punishment. ▫ Urbane Legend chinwag 00:09, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Technically people are being sent to prison to rehabilitate, not for punishment; if it was for punishment alone there are other more effective ways. 94.69.178.230 ( talk) 22:00, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
I think it should be stated near the beginning of the article that, when used, the donkey punch is almost exclusively executed during or just before the orgasm of the penetrating partner. I may be mistaken and I haven't found any sources to cite. Veecort ( talk) 13:26, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Okay, I found a source kinda sorta from Fox news. It is not very good but I am sure there are more out there. Veecort ( talk) 13:39, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
I added it to the end of the first paragraph. Also, I first learned about donkey punching from reading the Dan Savage article and he may have stated therein that it is executed just before orgasm. The first time I ever saw anything like it though was the scene in Oz, but I thought Cutler was just being an asshole. As soon as I read the article I understood that what I had seen years before was in fact a form of donkey punch. Veecort ( talk) 14:13, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Maybe, just maybe, correctly defined, a donkey punch is to the kidney area, or not; I don't know. Because I trust Dan Savage I will believe that it is a rabbit punch and not a kidney punch. But that leaves me wondering about the definition in the link above and also the scene from Oz. The definition from the link above is supposedly from a magazine called Popbitch. I believe it goes without saying that this is serious business and we need to clarify this kidney versus rabbit thing sooner rather than later. I am all over it but I am not an authority on the matter. Veecort ( talk) 22:16, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Is this a joke page? It has references to Urban Dictionary for crying out loud. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Poposhka ( talk • contribs) 02:14, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
AKE??? WTF? Are you kidding me???? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.99.23.49 ( talk) 08:47, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Does File:Donkey punch.jpg provide a clear or ambiguous illustration of the subject of the article (i.e., should it be kept or removed)? -- Black Falcon ( talk) 00:43, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
Just want to say that the picture with this article is HILARIOUS!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.63.24.93 ( talk) 02:51, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
As this act is probably apocryphal and possibly lethal, I would suggest the current picture is uncessary and inappropriate and should therefore be removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.110.59.80 ( talk) 18:27, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:TTSGA.gif, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests September 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 16:34, 18 September 2011 (UTC) |
The picture is blatantly sexist and offensive. The fact that it seems amusing and benign to some participants of this discussion gives even more cause for concern. That it seems to portray violence towards women in a way that can be perceived as lighthearted and funny, encourages violence against women by normalizing it. Furthermore, the heteronormative view of sex excludes homosexual relationships and people. The fact that Wikipedia is founded on open source philosophy gives even more reason to remove the picture: in this portrayal of sex, LGBTQA people are excluded, women are victimized, and the Wikipedia space ceases to be democratic, instead becoming a male-dominated and hetero-dominated domain. The picture is violent and should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.110.98.8 ( talk) 22:28, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
This site looks more and more like encylopediadramatica every day! How long do you suppose it will be before Wikipedia has an offended page and an article on goatse? Oh wait you already have one of the two http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goatse also kudos for the picture it really made me smile — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.90.65.235 ( talk) 04:05, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
I have put the comments in chronological order. I assume no editor would ever intentionally slight you for your opinion. However, a coordinated attempt to adjust a Wikipedia article is something that established editors will not appreciate. The image is thought provoking. I am sure we can use plenty of other descriptive phrases for it. But its use not meant to me funny. It is not meant to be lewd. It is meant to illustrate a topic that is already "inappropriate". Your input is appreciated and the image is not guaranteed. But please do not assume that it will be removed by throwing a comment or two up every few months from accounts that do not have a record of following the standards on Wikipedia. Keep the snickering to a minimum and appreciate the value of illustrating something that is worthy of notice. Appreciate that an actual photo is not being used. I can get a release on a couple who would love to be shown on Wikipedia in the throws of passion but I ask them to not make an already racy topic that much worse. Your feedback is great but there is a healthy balance right now and continued edit warring and campaigns by certain people to remove the image will not benefit the project. Keep in mind that no one looking up this subject is so innocent that they do not understand sex. Even more importantly, be happy that actual bodies are not being masturbated to while getting viruses. This is meant to be a record of the sum of human knowledge. Human knowledge consists of plenty of sex.07:17, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Oh wow she played the feminist card. Sorry your "degree" in women's studies didn't do anything other than make you better at whining on the internet about stuff that offends you, but a .gif of exactly what this article is about is most certainly not indicative of whatever oppressed view of the world you have. Grow up. 99.35.224.37 ( talk) 05:49, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
the lead says the goal is to create anal tensing, but earlier says that it's "allegedly" used during both anal or vaginal penetration. Does that mean that the vagina also tenses when someone hypothetically does this? Rodaen ( talk) 13:01, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
How was the Jeopardy contestant's answer incorrect? Technically, this term DOES describe a blow to the back of the neck, and it IS named for an animal.
It's not like the guy said "Falcon Punch." Oh, wait-- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.61.156.96 ( talk) 01:14, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
Reading this, I have to wonder if it's a plausible misinterpretation of something else. Cats and skunks are well known for biting the back of the neck to induce ovulation (they also make use of barbed penises, which likewise are not to be recommended!) Actually, even things as far diverged as stingrays engage in copulatory biting. [1] Even humans apparently have some chance of coitus-induced ovulation [2] - though from that source it looks like eroticism, rather than trauma, is what can trigger release of an extra egg and thus twin infants. My guess is that a gentle playful slap, nibble, etc. which is welcomed by the woman and contributes to the sensation of orgasm, should plausibly have some chance of increasing her fertile response. Of course, I still don't have any way right now to go from this to anything that would be acceptable under WP:NOR. Wnt ( talk) 23:29, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:"Donkey punch" (animated).gif, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 23:56, 9 February 2012 (UTC) |
I have removed the animated image from the article for two reasons. It does not aid the reader in understanding the text of the article and is therefore unnecessary. It is a poorly rendered cartoonish animation and as such not appropriate quality for inclusion in any article. The fact that the image is currently up for deletion is irrelevant. Delicious carbuncle ( talk) 05:51, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
It is gratuitous depiction of violence towards women. It is not educational, nor is it necessary in an encyclopedia. An appropriate image would help explain why the myth/hoax is not scientifically sound, which should be the objective of this article. John Vandenberg ( chat) 02:58, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
You know, the idea of illustrating this article is ridiculous. Remember that this is an article about the urban legend and NOT merely about this type of sexual violence. The distinction is important; if the point of the article were to outline this type of abuse, the image could be called pertinent. But that isn't what the article's about; it's about this urban myth. Does the image portray the myth? No, that's impossible; there's no physiological mechanism for a man to get increased pleasure from doing this. So what is this image, then? It's just a drawing of some dude punching a woman in the back of the head. It's as silly and pointless as contributing an image to Vagina dentata. -- JaGa talk 21:09, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
The Wikipedia page was created in July 2004. [3] The earliest reference we have is Dan Savage (December 2004). [4] I've looked through the archives and AFDs, and couldn't find (reliable) sources that pre-dates the Wikipedia page being created. The closest is what appears to be a user generated site with a page created May 14, 2004 [5] Gia Paloma has claimed to have done this; I havent found when she did it (JM Productions 2004 film Guttermouths 30?). There have been a few porn movies which have included this in a scene; would be good to add the dates of them. Here is a September 2004 comic [6] John Vandenberg ( chat) 09:48, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
I've found 2001 user generated entry for the term [11] in a rather short glossary [12]. And a list a list in 2002 which also indicates that kidney or head are interchangeable, and that the desired outcome only occur if the receiving partner is knocked out. :/ John Vandenberg ( chat) 02:32, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
... here. -- J N 466 19:43, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
I see that the picture was deleted, then an article protection was placed. In theory this "does not take sides in the dispute". For those who have not observed censorship WikiGaming, this is how I think things are likely to go. I hope I'm wrong, but we'll see:
I hope I'm wrong here, but I've seen similar things before. Wnt ( talk) 16:42, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
JN466 linked to some video clips at Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:"Donkey punch" (animated).gif - namely [13] and [14] The first of these is pretty clear, though I'm not sure about the second. Provided that we include some appropriate discussion of the scene from the original film, it would be appropriate to upload the first clip as a WP:Fair Use file. We might not need the drawing here after that. Wnt ( talk) 17:52, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
The content of this article concerns me.
Essentially what we have are slang dictionary definitions, a sex columnists opinion and a medical view of the dangers. I feel we are missing a critical piece of the puzzle that lets us actually write a neutral article - and that piece is origins and use in the real world. As fun as the crusade, and counter-crusade, is against the image I feel it is the least of the issues with this article (which has been sly-POV butchered beyond belief). -- Errant ( chat!) 23:25, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
I agree that it should be specified that the outcome rather than the act is fictional. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.121.6.113 ( talk) 04:27, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
I found a donkey punch gif on imgur so I think its a valid source since I saw some imgur cited sources before http://i.imgur.com/Lj7xE.gif
So I think that image should be added to the article -- F_JUNK _DUMP 23:17, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
I've fixed the quotation after the screen cap seen at http://guyspeed.com/jeopardy-contestant-asks-what-is-a-donkey-punch-video/. Didn't think the page merits inclusion in the references (also I don't know how to do that). Hope this is alright. -- 84.63.171.10 ( talk) 21:30, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
The article as currently written incorrectly implies that the idea of the Donkey Punch originated in the 20th century.
This is incorrect, it in fact dates back to at least the eighteenth century, being described at least twice in the Marquis de Sade's The 120 Days of Sodom, although it was not therein referred to by the modern english name "donkey punch" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.121.6.113 ( talk) 23:21, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
The idea that this doesn't work is completely false. There might not be any mechanism by which the anal sphincter contracts simply from a light blow to the head, but if you knock the recipient unconscious or kill them it certainly does work. Gerry Radulovic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.166.48.244 ( talk) 16:11, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
I publish this in this space just hoping not to be deleted by one know-it-all mod. First of all, there're two films called Donkey Punch: the original porn version (2005) and a UK film (2008). There you can see perform a donkey punch, simulated obviously. Second, a form of donkey punch, hair-pulling instead of punching is possible (and not an 'urban legend'). Both have the same purpose. Doing anal sex doggy-style, and just before orgasm, I pull the hair of my partner and ask her to tense up her anus. It's just that simple. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.102.46.146 ( talk) 17:12, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
Cyberbot II has detected links on Donkey punch which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
\blukeisback\.com\b
on the local blacklistIf you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 17:19, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Concerning the audio file associated with this page:
File:Donkeypunch.ogg
...there are bits where the speaker adds parts that are not (and never were) a part of the article (go to 2:22 for an example of this). The audio file should be taken down. -- Wickedjargon ( talk) 05:17, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
i have since removed the file from the article -- Wickedjargon ( talk) 05:17, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Donkey punch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:23, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Donkey punch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:35, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Donkey punch (cocktail) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 07:09, 21 August 2022 (UTC)