This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Oxfordshire may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
This entry is misleading. With so little evidence of existence, "emperor" and "rule" should be avoided or put into a clearer context. Maximus Rex 20:13, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
I agree it is misleading to call Domitianus II an Emperor as he never controlled the city of Rome or a military force sufficiently powerful as to preserve his regime against rivals. He is more correctly categorised as a Roman usurper. Pjbjas ( talk) 17:06, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Oxfordshire may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
This entry is misleading. With so little evidence of existence, "emperor" and "rule" should be avoided or put into a clearer context. Maximus Rex 20:13, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
I agree it is misleading to call Domitianus II an Emperor as he never controlled the city of Rome or a military force sufficiently powerful as to preserve his regime against rivals. He is more correctly categorised as a Roman usurper. Pjbjas ( talk) 17:06, 16 June 2009 (UTC)