This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The image that has the replaceable fair use tag on it should be deleted, or not? I have a copy of it saved to my PC. I'll delete it now, but you can tell me here that if I get the pic again, I can revert it, and upload it back. Thanks. Hasek is the best 05:54, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Hasek is the best 04:05, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Oh yeah. Like "temp" for 'template'. Cause unexperienced wikipedians don't know what the heck someone means. But even I still don't much. But who does? Anyway, the short forms do make it quicker. Admit it (I do) that edit summaries can be annoyning, especially when somebody's in a rush. (I turn 12 soon.) But it arrives on the first school day after the break. Not a good 'present' isn't it? (Hey, would you still rather to change the "Hašek" to Hasek still, about the name controversy?) Hasek is the best 04:49, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Hey, the Vezina and Hart trophy image is now back on the Vezina Trophy page; should we upload it here? oh yeah, I'd like to add I found an article (see bottom) that said the Sabres got outshot year after year, so I'm not sure where to put this; and this can just be for other things to cite or add. Hasek is the best 19:05, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Should this talk page use an archive? This page is getting too crowded, and is tougher for low internet connected computers to access pages with many data and size. Thanks. (Oh yeah, we can still keep the templates on.) --- Hasek is the best 22:50, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Sure, then. Hasek is the best 03:10, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
I think we should withdraw the GA nomination for now- I count four citations needed, and I feel the prose is rather weak and choppy throughout most of the article. -- Wafulz 03:13, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
I'm not really a Hockey fan but this article is off to a very good start. However, there are several one sentence paragraphs (particularly in the beginning-early years and early NHL career) that need to be addressed and one section that is two sentences. I'm going to put it's GA review on hold until these are addressed. However just to show you that I really am a tremendously nice guy I went out and found you guys a bullet proof fair use pic of him for the infobox. Quadzilla99 11:32, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
I've removed some statements from the article because I'm not sure if they belong, or I think they might be too difficult to source. Feel free to list/discuss any others.
He has become a goaltending pioneer by introducing several new saves. One of his most notable is the "Hašek Roll", where he folds into a 'C' shape, covering the bottom of the net. He was also one of the first goalies to lay flat on their stomach with their pads outstretched to the sides to make saves.
I failed the GA as it had too many 1-3 sentence paragraphs and too many {{ Fact}} tags. No one seemed to be willing to address my objections or even state whether they disagreed with them so I failed it. If you disagree just drop me a line or relist it and I'll step aside to let someone else review it. Quadzilla99 05:46, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Why was the image of Hasek in Buffalo deleted? It's tag is a 'movie screenshot' and I read WP:FAIRUSE and had a list of fair use types (GFDL, etc.) which did include a screenshot from a movie. That meant it had to be fair use. So I'm sort of confused. Hasek is the best 16:25, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
I'm a part of WikiProject Hockey, but I'll try my best to review this article with a neutral view.
This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of February 24, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:
When these issues are addressed, the article can be resubmitted for consideration. Thanks for your work so far.
I was going to put the article on hold and allow you time to fix it. But, two criteria fails is a general fail. If you like, I can help clean up the prose of the article, but that would mean that I can not re-review it. -- Scorpion 01:50, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
I had to remove this part because we need a better citation other than a compilation of videos, especially if we want good (and eventually featured) status for this article. The viewer defaults to Hasek's most recent games, so you'd have to dig very deep to get a proper source. Here's the material I removed:
Especially in his years in Buffalo, Hašek would unpredictably dive his body out sideways to take away the puck or trip the player with possesion of the puck in a breakaway situation, to result in covering the puck or get possesion of the puck for his teammates to bring up ice. (1:23)
I don't think it's worder properly either- do you mean the saves where Hasek comes way way out of the crease? I've seen him skate way the hell out to the blue line to dive and trip a player chasing the puck (as illustrated in this parody image). -- Wafulz 00:37, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The image that has the replaceable fair use tag on it should be deleted, or not? I have a copy of it saved to my PC. I'll delete it now, but you can tell me here that if I get the pic again, I can revert it, and upload it back. Thanks. Hasek is the best 05:54, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Hasek is the best 04:05, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Oh yeah. Like "temp" for 'template'. Cause unexperienced wikipedians don't know what the heck someone means. But even I still don't much. But who does? Anyway, the short forms do make it quicker. Admit it (I do) that edit summaries can be annoyning, especially when somebody's in a rush. (I turn 12 soon.) But it arrives on the first school day after the break. Not a good 'present' isn't it? (Hey, would you still rather to change the "Hašek" to Hasek still, about the name controversy?) Hasek is the best 04:49, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Hey, the Vezina and Hart trophy image is now back on the Vezina Trophy page; should we upload it here? oh yeah, I'd like to add I found an article (see bottom) that said the Sabres got outshot year after year, so I'm not sure where to put this; and this can just be for other things to cite or add. Hasek is the best 19:05, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Should this talk page use an archive? This page is getting too crowded, and is tougher for low internet connected computers to access pages with many data and size. Thanks. (Oh yeah, we can still keep the templates on.) --- Hasek is the best 22:50, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Sure, then. Hasek is the best 03:10, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
I think we should withdraw the GA nomination for now- I count four citations needed, and I feel the prose is rather weak and choppy throughout most of the article. -- Wafulz 03:13, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
I'm not really a Hockey fan but this article is off to a very good start. However, there are several one sentence paragraphs (particularly in the beginning-early years and early NHL career) that need to be addressed and one section that is two sentences. I'm going to put it's GA review on hold until these are addressed. However just to show you that I really am a tremendously nice guy I went out and found you guys a bullet proof fair use pic of him for the infobox. Quadzilla99 11:32, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
I've removed some statements from the article because I'm not sure if they belong, or I think they might be too difficult to source. Feel free to list/discuss any others.
He has become a goaltending pioneer by introducing several new saves. One of his most notable is the "Hašek Roll", where he folds into a 'C' shape, covering the bottom of the net. He was also one of the first goalies to lay flat on their stomach with their pads outstretched to the sides to make saves.
I failed the GA as it had too many 1-3 sentence paragraphs and too many {{ Fact}} tags. No one seemed to be willing to address my objections or even state whether they disagreed with them so I failed it. If you disagree just drop me a line or relist it and I'll step aside to let someone else review it. Quadzilla99 05:46, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Why was the image of Hasek in Buffalo deleted? It's tag is a 'movie screenshot' and I read WP:FAIRUSE and had a list of fair use types (GFDL, etc.) which did include a screenshot from a movie. That meant it had to be fair use. So I'm sort of confused. Hasek is the best 16:25, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
I'm a part of WikiProject Hockey, but I'll try my best to review this article with a neutral view.
This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of February 24, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:
When these issues are addressed, the article can be resubmitted for consideration. Thanks for your work so far.
I was going to put the article on hold and allow you time to fix it. But, two criteria fails is a general fail. If you like, I can help clean up the prose of the article, but that would mean that I can not re-review it. -- Scorpion 01:50, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
I had to remove this part because we need a better citation other than a compilation of videos, especially if we want good (and eventually featured) status for this article. The viewer defaults to Hasek's most recent games, so you'd have to dig very deep to get a proper source. Here's the material I removed:
Especially in his years in Buffalo, Hašek would unpredictably dive his body out sideways to take away the puck or trip the player with possesion of the puck in a breakaway situation, to result in covering the puck or get possesion of the puck for his teammates to bring up ice. (1:23)
I don't think it's worder properly either- do you mean the saves where Hasek comes way way out of the crease? I've seen him skate way the hell out to the blue line to dive and trip a player chasing the puck (as illustrated in this parody image). -- Wafulz 00:37, 3 March 2007 (UTC)