This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
I have just modified one external link on
Doll Domination – The Mini Collection. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
I have just modified 2 external links on
Doll Domination – The Mini Collection. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the
Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
Appropriate for me to review this since not only have we collaborated before, but the GA backlog is going on right now! --
K. Peake 11:40, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply
"The Mini Collection was one of" → "The former was one of"
✗ Not done, the existing text is clearer. Suggested text is unclear and confusing
I made this suggestion because of the title already being used in this para, plus it's clear the EP is former here --
K. Peake 07:42, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Neither here nor there to the overall standard of the article ≫
Lil-Unique1-{
Talk }- 21:24, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
"era and was released in" → "era, being released in"
 Done, changed
"legs of their" → "legs of the group's"
 Done, changed
"Upon release, the EP debuted at number nine in on" → "The EP debuted at number nine on" and this should be moved to being the last sentence of the second paragraph instead
✗ Not done, in context of the rest of the lead it doesn't make sense as the second and third paragraph flow together. I would normally agree otherwise.
Yeah that is fine, my bar for not looking at context properly. --
K. Peake 07:42, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
"second single and is a" → "second single, which is a"
 Done, changed
"peaking in the top ten on" → "peaking in the top 10 of"
 Done, changed
"Australia but in the UK it peaked at number 17 and in the US at number 73." → "Australia, though it reached number 17 in the UK and number 73 in the United States."
 Done, changed
"Both songs attracted controversy" → ""Jai Ho! (You Are My Destiny)" and "Hush Hush; Hush Hush" both attracted controversy"
"an interview Billboard magazine's" → "an interview with Billboard magazine's"
 Done, changed
"He called Doll Domination" → "He called the album"
 Done, changed
"had sold 400,000 copies" → "had sold less than 400,000 copies"
 Done, changed
"was on the way called" → "was set to be released under the title of"
 Done, changed
"In comparison, the group's first album..." this sentence is not only incorrect because that article is from 2008, but it also off topic since there is no mention of Doll Domination in that article whatsoever
Not sure what you mean, this sentence is about the previous album, serving as a comparison between the sales of PCD versus Doll Domination.
I am aware it is used to compare the sales of the two albums, but this is trivial since the source about PCD not only offers no mention of the other album, but it is from a different period in time. --
K. Peake 07:44, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
"All of the releases" → "All of the releases for the album"
 Done, changed
"of the group's then most recent single" → "of the Pussycat Dolls' then-most recent single"
Add release year of the single in brackets
 Done, changed
"new song "Painted Windows" and" → "their new song "Painted Windows", and"
 Done, changed
"which was taken from the original release" → "that was included on the original release"
 Done, changed
Music and lyrics
"and during their support act" → "and appearing as a support act" on the img main text
 Done changed
Remove wikilink on extended play
 Done changed
"is 26 minutes and 3 seconds long," → "has a length of 26 minutes and 3 seconds,"
 Done changed
"from the group's 2008 album, Doll Domination." → "from Doll Domination."
 Done changed
"It was released on" → "The former was released on"
 Done changed
"and includes the group's then most recent single" → "and includes"
 Done changed
Remove wikilink on "Jai Ho! (You Are My Destiny)"
✗ Not done, its fine to link things once in each section
Took a look at
WP:OVERLINK and you are actually right, in this context; would not be for trivial words or places though. --
K. Peake 13:58, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
"a new song "Painted Windows" and" → ""Painted Windows", and the remix song"
 Done changed
Remove wikilink on "Hush Hush; Hush Hush"
✗ Not done, see previous comment
"a remix of the group's..." remove since like the above, it is repeated from the previous section
✗ Not done, see previous comment
That is not linking though; it is instead the issue of repetition because do we really need to reintroduce? --
K. Peake 13:58, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
From a user experience point of view, if you navigate to the section directly, makes more sense to repeat. ≫
Lil-Unique1-{
Talk }- 21:30, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
"comprises previously released singles," → "comprises the group's 2008 singles"
 Done changed
"The EP was preceded" → "The Mini Collection was preceded"
 Done changed
"the release of a" → "the single release of a"
 Done changed
""Jai Ho! (You Are My Destiny)" which is" → ""Jai Ho! (You Are My Destiny)", which is"
 Done changed
"which is taken from the" → "that was included on the"
 Done changed
"how the song came about, one of the song's writers," → "how the song was created, co-writer"
✗ Not done - there's no issue with linking to things once in each new section
Remove target on soundtrack
✗ Not done - there's no issue with linking to things once in each new section
"on March 13 which was" → "on March 13 of that year, which was"
 Done
Remove wikilink on Austria
 Done
"The group recreate" → "the group recreate"
 Done
Remove wikilink on Slumdog Millionaire
✗ Not done - there's no issue with linking to things once in each new section
Why is this wikilinked on the second mention in the section instead of the first? --
K. Peake 10:42, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
"around the world including" → "around the world, including"
 Done
"native country of the United States." → "native country of the US."
 Done
"at number three and as of 2017, had sold" → "at number three on the
UK Singles Charts and as of 2017, it has sold"
 Done
"to become the group's second" → "to become the Pussycatt Dolls' second"
 Done
"selling single in the territory behind" → "selling single in the UK, behind"
 Done
"The single was included" → "The song was included"
 Done
"part of their set list" → "part of the group's set list"
 Done
"supporting slot on
Britney Spears's" → "support slot on Spears'"
✗ Not done - there's no issue with linking to things once in each new section
You are supposed to refer to people by surnames after the first mention if they are identified by their real name --
K. Peake 10:42, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
"Integers from zero to nine are spelled out in words." This is ten, not nine or less... --
K. Peake 10:42, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
"including number four" → "including number 4" per
MOS:NUM
✗ Not done, not correct per
MOS:NUMERAL, which says "Integers from zero to nine are spelled out in words."
Read MOS:NUM on comparative values, though --
K. Peake 10:42, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
"number five in" → "number 5 in"
✗ Not done, not correct per
MOS:NUMERAL, which says "Integers from zero to nine are spelled out in words."
"number six in" → "number 6 in"
✗ Not done, not correct per
MOS:NUMERAL, which says "Integers from zero to nine are spelled out in words."
"number ten in" → "number 10 in"
✗ Not done, not correct per
MOS:NUMERAL, which says "Integers from zero to nine are spelled out in words." ≫
Lil-Unique1-{
Talk }- 09:49, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Reception and impact
Critical reception
Remove the ratings box since it is only one review and already written in prose that it was four stars
 Done
"Nick Levine siad that "at" → "Nick Levine said of The Mini Collection that "at"
The info about "Jai Ho! (You Are My Destiny)" does not appear to be backed up at all
I followed the principles of
WP:CITE, its a fact that "Jai Ho!" features Nicole Scherzinger. its in the single listings, the cover art etc. This doesn't need sourcing?
"...follow up single "
Hush Hush; Hush Hush" also initially listed the singer" → ""Hush Hush; Hush Hush" initially listed Scherzinger"
 Done
Remove wikilink on The Circus Starring Britney Spears
The Writing Camp and Brick & Lace should both only be targeted to on the first mention of the members here
Not sure what you mean, but its standard practice to link each member of the group
Rahman →
A. R. Rahman under producers, with the wikilink
 Done
Target Theron Thomas to
R. City and remove target on Timothy Thomas
 Done
Elliott →
Missy Elliott under songwriters, with the wikilink
 Done
Remove target to Quiz & Larossi for Josef Larossi
See previous comment
Notes and samples should be subheadings, not subsections
 Done
"He's Always There" as written by Jim McCarty and Paul Samwell-Smith performed → "He's Always There", as written by Jim McCarty and Paul Samwell-Smith, and performed
 Done
"Je M'appelle Jane" as written by Mickael Furnon performed → "Je M'appelle Jane", as written by Mickael Furnon and performed
 Done
"
I Will Survive" as written by Freddie Perren and Dino Fekaris and → "
I Will Survive", as written by Freddie Perren and Dino Fekaris, and an
 Done
by David Blumberg performed → by David Blumberg, as performed
The imgs here are not needed, since it is not required for pics of so many musicians
✗ Not done, there's no set standard for what can and can't be done and its unusual for us to be able to have images for all of the personnel involved. I see no issue with this.
You should not have these tables; lay it out like most credits and personnel sections plus instead put (track...) for people's credits with the numbers in the brackets rather than separate tracks
"the group's debut album" → "the group's debut studio album"
 Done
"70,000 copies[62] and was certified silver" → "70,000 copies in the UK." moving [62] to the end of the sentence and remove [63], since it was later certified gold so silver is non-notable
 Done
"the release was certified Gold," → "the EP was certified gold by the
British Phonographic Industry (BPI)" with the wikilink
 On hold but one issue I noticed throughout the review was that you have been heavily overlinking in this article. --
K. Peake 21:02, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Lil-unique1 Be sure to respond wherever I have questioned you directly. --
K. Peake 11:50, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Kyle Peake, will do! I'm about half way through. I'll go back and respond to any prior comments too in the next round. ≫
Lil-Unique1-{
Talk }- 11:58, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Kyle Peake I think I've made all of the changes (or addressed if necessary). ≫
Lil-Unique1-{
Talk }- 22:00, 21 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Lil-unique1✓ Pass now even if it is a while after the review, though you do have some proper reasons for not implementing certain changes. --
K. Peake 07:14, 22 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Kyle Peake Cheers. Always a pleasure to work with a kind/thoughtful and insightful reviewer. ≫
Lil-Unique1-{
Talk }- 08:00, 22 October 2020 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
I have just modified one external link on
Doll Domination – The Mini Collection. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
I have just modified 2 external links on
Doll Domination – The Mini Collection. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the
Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
Appropriate for me to review this since not only have we collaborated before, but the GA backlog is going on right now! --
K. Peake 11:40, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply
"The Mini Collection was one of" → "The former was one of"
✗ Not done, the existing text is clearer. Suggested text is unclear and confusing
I made this suggestion because of the title already being used in this para, plus it's clear the EP is former here --
K. Peake 07:42, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Neither here nor there to the overall standard of the article ≫
Lil-Unique1-{
Talk }- 21:24, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
"era and was released in" → "era, being released in"
 Done, changed
"legs of their" → "legs of the group's"
 Done, changed
"Upon release, the EP debuted at number nine in on" → "The EP debuted at number nine on" and this should be moved to being the last sentence of the second paragraph instead
✗ Not done, in context of the rest of the lead it doesn't make sense as the second and third paragraph flow together. I would normally agree otherwise.
Yeah that is fine, my bar for not looking at context properly. --
K. Peake 07:42, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
"second single and is a" → "second single, which is a"
 Done, changed
"peaking in the top ten on" → "peaking in the top 10 of"
 Done, changed
"Australia but in the UK it peaked at number 17 and in the US at number 73." → "Australia, though it reached number 17 in the UK and number 73 in the United States."
 Done, changed
"Both songs attracted controversy" → ""Jai Ho! (You Are My Destiny)" and "Hush Hush; Hush Hush" both attracted controversy"
"an interview Billboard magazine's" → "an interview with Billboard magazine's"
 Done, changed
"He called Doll Domination" → "He called the album"
 Done, changed
"had sold 400,000 copies" → "had sold less than 400,000 copies"
 Done, changed
"was on the way called" → "was set to be released under the title of"
 Done, changed
"In comparison, the group's first album..." this sentence is not only incorrect because that article is from 2008, but it also off topic since there is no mention of Doll Domination in that article whatsoever
Not sure what you mean, this sentence is about the previous album, serving as a comparison between the sales of PCD versus Doll Domination.
I am aware it is used to compare the sales of the two albums, but this is trivial since the source about PCD not only offers no mention of the other album, but it is from a different period in time. --
K. Peake 07:44, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
"All of the releases" → "All of the releases for the album"
 Done, changed
"of the group's then most recent single" → "of the Pussycat Dolls' then-most recent single"
Add release year of the single in brackets
 Done, changed
"new song "Painted Windows" and" → "their new song "Painted Windows", and"
 Done, changed
"which was taken from the original release" → "that was included on the original release"
 Done, changed
Music and lyrics
"and during their support act" → "and appearing as a support act" on the img main text
 Done changed
Remove wikilink on extended play
 Done changed
"is 26 minutes and 3 seconds long," → "has a length of 26 minutes and 3 seconds,"
 Done changed
"from the group's 2008 album, Doll Domination." → "from Doll Domination."
 Done changed
"It was released on" → "The former was released on"
 Done changed
"and includes the group's then most recent single" → "and includes"
 Done changed
Remove wikilink on "Jai Ho! (You Are My Destiny)"
✗ Not done, its fine to link things once in each section
Took a look at
WP:OVERLINK and you are actually right, in this context; would not be for trivial words or places though. --
K. Peake 13:58, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
"a new song "Painted Windows" and" → ""Painted Windows", and the remix song"
 Done changed
Remove wikilink on "Hush Hush; Hush Hush"
✗ Not done, see previous comment
"a remix of the group's..." remove since like the above, it is repeated from the previous section
✗ Not done, see previous comment
That is not linking though; it is instead the issue of repetition because do we really need to reintroduce? --
K. Peake 13:58, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
From a user experience point of view, if you navigate to the section directly, makes more sense to repeat. ≫
Lil-Unique1-{
Talk }- 21:30, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
"comprises previously released singles," → "comprises the group's 2008 singles"
 Done changed
"The EP was preceded" → "The Mini Collection was preceded"
 Done changed
"the release of a" → "the single release of a"
 Done changed
""Jai Ho! (You Are My Destiny)" which is" → ""Jai Ho! (You Are My Destiny)", which is"
 Done changed
"which is taken from the" → "that was included on the"
 Done changed
"how the song came about, one of the song's writers," → "how the song was created, co-writer"
✗ Not done - there's no issue with linking to things once in each new section
Remove target on soundtrack
✗ Not done - there's no issue with linking to things once in each new section
"on March 13 which was" → "on March 13 of that year, which was"
 Done
Remove wikilink on Austria
 Done
"The group recreate" → "the group recreate"
 Done
Remove wikilink on Slumdog Millionaire
✗ Not done - there's no issue with linking to things once in each new section
Why is this wikilinked on the second mention in the section instead of the first? --
K. Peake 10:42, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
"around the world including" → "around the world, including"
 Done
"native country of the United States." → "native country of the US."
 Done
"at number three and as of 2017, had sold" → "at number three on the
UK Singles Charts and as of 2017, it has sold"
 Done
"to become the group's second" → "to become the Pussycatt Dolls' second"
 Done
"selling single in the territory behind" → "selling single in the UK, behind"
 Done
"The single was included" → "The song was included"
 Done
"part of their set list" → "part of the group's set list"
 Done
"supporting slot on
Britney Spears's" → "support slot on Spears'"
✗ Not done - there's no issue with linking to things once in each new section
You are supposed to refer to people by surnames after the first mention if they are identified by their real name --
K. Peake 10:42, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
"Integers from zero to nine are spelled out in words." This is ten, not nine or less... --
K. Peake 10:42, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
"including number four" → "including number 4" per
MOS:NUM
✗ Not done, not correct per
MOS:NUMERAL, which says "Integers from zero to nine are spelled out in words."
Read MOS:NUM on comparative values, though --
K. Peake 10:42, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
"number five in" → "number 5 in"
✗ Not done, not correct per
MOS:NUMERAL, which says "Integers from zero to nine are spelled out in words."
"number six in" → "number 6 in"
✗ Not done, not correct per
MOS:NUMERAL, which says "Integers from zero to nine are spelled out in words."
"number ten in" → "number 10 in"
✗ Not done, not correct per
MOS:NUMERAL, which says "Integers from zero to nine are spelled out in words." ≫
Lil-Unique1-{
Talk }- 09:49, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Reception and impact
Critical reception
Remove the ratings box since it is only one review and already written in prose that it was four stars
 Done
"Nick Levine siad that "at" → "Nick Levine said of The Mini Collection that "at"
The info about "Jai Ho! (You Are My Destiny)" does not appear to be backed up at all
I followed the principles of
WP:CITE, its a fact that "Jai Ho!" features Nicole Scherzinger. its in the single listings, the cover art etc. This doesn't need sourcing?
"...follow up single "
Hush Hush; Hush Hush" also initially listed the singer" → ""Hush Hush; Hush Hush" initially listed Scherzinger"
 Done
Remove wikilink on The Circus Starring Britney Spears
The Writing Camp and Brick & Lace should both only be targeted to on the first mention of the members here
Not sure what you mean, but its standard practice to link each member of the group
Rahman →
A. R. Rahman under producers, with the wikilink
 Done
Target Theron Thomas to
R. City and remove target on Timothy Thomas
 Done
Elliott →
Missy Elliott under songwriters, with the wikilink
 Done
Remove target to Quiz & Larossi for Josef Larossi
See previous comment
Notes and samples should be subheadings, not subsections
 Done
"He's Always There" as written by Jim McCarty and Paul Samwell-Smith performed → "He's Always There", as written by Jim McCarty and Paul Samwell-Smith, and performed
 Done
"Je M'appelle Jane" as written by Mickael Furnon performed → "Je M'appelle Jane", as written by Mickael Furnon and performed
 Done
"
I Will Survive" as written by Freddie Perren and Dino Fekaris and → "
I Will Survive", as written by Freddie Perren and Dino Fekaris, and an
 Done
by David Blumberg performed → by David Blumberg, as performed
The imgs here are not needed, since it is not required for pics of so many musicians
✗ Not done, there's no set standard for what can and can't be done and its unusual for us to be able to have images for all of the personnel involved. I see no issue with this.
You should not have these tables; lay it out like most credits and personnel sections plus instead put (track...) for people's credits with the numbers in the brackets rather than separate tracks
"the group's debut album" → "the group's debut studio album"
 Done
"70,000 copies[62] and was certified silver" → "70,000 copies in the UK." moving [62] to the end of the sentence and remove [63], since it was later certified gold so silver is non-notable
 Done
"the release was certified Gold," → "the EP was certified gold by the
British Phonographic Industry (BPI)" with the wikilink
 On hold but one issue I noticed throughout the review was that you have been heavily overlinking in this article. --
K. Peake 21:02, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Lil-unique1 Be sure to respond wherever I have questioned you directly. --
K. Peake 11:50, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Kyle Peake, will do! I'm about half way through. I'll go back and respond to any prior comments too in the next round. ≫
Lil-Unique1-{
Talk }- 11:58, 16 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Kyle Peake I think I've made all of the changes (or addressed if necessary). ≫
Lil-Unique1-{
Talk }- 22:00, 21 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Lil-unique1✓ Pass now even if it is a while after the review, though you do have some proper reasons for not implementing certain changes. --
K. Peake 07:14, 22 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Kyle Peake Cheers. Always a pleasure to work with a kind/thoughtful and insightful reviewer. ≫
Lil-Unique1-{
Talk }- 08:00, 22 October 2020 (UTC)reply