![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Doctor Who (2008–10 specials). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 08:28, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Doctor Who (2008–2010 specials). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:46, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Adamstom.97 ( talk · contribs) 09:10, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
I'll take this one for review for you. I've done a couple of these articles at this point, so I reckon there'll be a few points to cover if it is inline with the others (but nothing major). Hopefully I can get that feedback to you in the next couple of days. -
adamstom97 (
talk)
09:10, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Okay, not too much from me for this one:
Also, I'm not sure if this has been the case in my previous reviews for these articles or not, but is there a reason for having release after the reception section? That seems wrong to me. Let me know, and also let me know if there are any questions about those couple of things. - adamstom97 ( talk) 01:38, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Doctor Who (2008–10 specials). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 08:28, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Doctor Who (2008–2010 specials). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:46, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Adamstom.97 ( talk · contribs) 09:10, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
I'll take this one for review for you. I've done a couple of these articles at this point, so I reckon there'll be a few points to cover if it is inline with the others (but nothing major). Hopefully I can get that feedback to you in the next couple of days. -
adamstom97 (
talk)
09:10, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Okay, not too much from me for this one:
Also, I'm not sure if this has been the case in my previous reviews for these articles or not, but is there a reason for having release after the reception section? That seems wrong to me. Let me know, and also let me know if there are any questions about those couple of things. - adamstom97 ( talk) 01:38, 19 October 2018 (UTC)