Prose feels tight, and expanded where necesary - support a promotion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for
GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.
If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)
I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I will use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.
Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.
Immediate Failures
It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria - y
It contains copyright infringements - Not so sure. Copyvio check isn't happy
[1]
It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include{{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF-tags}}). - Y
It is not stable due to edit warring on the page. -Y
Lede needs a little more info on Doctor Who. It does say about it being the revived series, but it should say somewhere when the original was first aired. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs)16:47, 1 September 2019 (UTC)reply
The series stars Matt Smith as the eleventh incarnation of the Doctor, an alien Time Lord who travels through time and space in his TARDIS, which appears to be a British police box on the outside. - but on the inside? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs)16:47, 1 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Done They're absolutely needed. Supplemental episodes are always included in a series' article, whether they were broadcast or released online (the latter, in this case). I have added a source to cite the prequels. -- /
Alex/
2102:51, 2 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Darvill had appeared in the previous series in a recurring role, but became a regular in this series.[4] Darvill had his "fingers crossed" that he would become a regular. - merge into one entence Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs)17:14, 1 September 2019 (UTC)reply
"A Christmas Carol" guest starred Michael Gambon and Katherine Jenkins.[8] Guest stars of the main series included Michael Sheen (voice),[9] Imelda Staunton (voice), Suranne Jones,[10] David Walliams,[11] Hugh Bonneville,[12] Lily Cole,[13] Mark Sheppard,[14] and Daniel Mays.[15] - could we say what sort of characters they played? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs)17:14, 1 September 2019 (UTC)reply
"The Girl Who Waited" is a "Doctor-lite" episode[40] which allowed Tom MacRae to explore Amy and Rory's characters and relationship. - Jargon on Doctor-lite. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs)17:14, 1 September 2019 (UTC)reply
"Night Terrors" was the first episode to be filmed[31] in September 2010. - ambiguous. Say "Night Terrors" was the first episode of the series to be filmed, being shot in September 2010. Sounds currently like it was the first, but they were all filmed in September. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs)17:14, 1 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Done Graph's shouldn't be "zoomed in"; i.e. to show from the 6 to 9 million lines, for example. Graphs should always start at zero. However, I don't believe it's really even necessary, none of the other articles include the graph, and there's already a ratings table. I've removed it. -- /
Alex/
2102:51, 2 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated note - If you fancy returning the favour, I have outstanding GA nominations that require reviewing at
WP:GAN. I'd be very grateful if you were to complete one of these, however it's definately not manditory. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs)07:17, 11 June 2019 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Prose feels tight, and expanded where necesary - support a promotion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for
GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.
If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)
I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I will use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.
Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.
Immediate Failures
It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria - y
It contains copyright infringements - Not so sure. Copyvio check isn't happy
[1]
It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include{{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF-tags}}). - Y
It is not stable due to edit warring on the page. -Y
Lede needs a little more info on Doctor Who. It does say about it being the revived series, but it should say somewhere when the original was first aired. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs)16:47, 1 September 2019 (UTC)reply
The series stars Matt Smith as the eleventh incarnation of the Doctor, an alien Time Lord who travels through time and space in his TARDIS, which appears to be a British police box on the outside. - but on the inside? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs)16:47, 1 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Done They're absolutely needed. Supplemental episodes are always included in a series' article, whether they were broadcast or released online (the latter, in this case). I have added a source to cite the prequels. -- /
Alex/
2102:51, 2 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Darvill had appeared in the previous series in a recurring role, but became a regular in this series.[4] Darvill had his "fingers crossed" that he would become a regular. - merge into one entence Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs)17:14, 1 September 2019 (UTC)reply
"A Christmas Carol" guest starred Michael Gambon and Katherine Jenkins.[8] Guest stars of the main series included Michael Sheen (voice),[9] Imelda Staunton (voice), Suranne Jones,[10] David Walliams,[11] Hugh Bonneville,[12] Lily Cole,[13] Mark Sheppard,[14] and Daniel Mays.[15] - could we say what sort of characters they played? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs)17:14, 1 September 2019 (UTC)reply
"The Girl Who Waited" is a "Doctor-lite" episode[40] which allowed Tom MacRae to explore Amy and Rory's characters and relationship. - Jargon on Doctor-lite. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs)17:14, 1 September 2019 (UTC)reply
"Night Terrors" was the first episode to be filmed[31] in September 2010. - ambiguous. Say "Night Terrors" was the first episode of the series to be filmed, being shot in September 2010. Sounds currently like it was the first, but they were all filmed in September. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs)17:14, 1 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Done Graph's shouldn't be "zoomed in"; i.e. to show from the 6 to 9 million lines, for example. Graphs should always start at zero. However, I don't believe it's really even necessary, none of the other articles include the graph, and there's already a ratings table. I've removed it. -- /
Alex/
2102:51, 2 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Automated note - If you fancy returning the favour, I have outstanding GA nominations that require reviewing at
WP:GAN. I'd be very grateful if you were to complete one of these, however it's definately not manditory. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs)07:17, 11 June 2019 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.