This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
The links section seems misleading. It says "DocBook.org official site" -- which seems to imply this is the official site for DocBook, which it isn't (though it is a very good site!). It's the official site for the O'Reilly book about DocBook. If there's an official site for DocBook (the standard), it's probably the OASIS one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.16.250.100 ( talk • contribs) 2004-10-28T17:32:31 (UTC)
== Redirection from WikiText ==
Eh, why is tag
WikiText redirected to this term? Probably mistake?
--
Martin Kozák 23:16, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
DocBook 5 final looks like it's going to drop any time now. When it does, should the article be updated to talk about DocBook 5, and simply mention that there were prior SGML and XML DTD-defined versions? Korval 05:30, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Can someone compare this with Latex/Tex?-- Adoniscik ( talk) 16:41, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
\documentclass[12pt]{article}
\title{Very simple book}
\begin{document}
\maketitle
\chapter{Chapter 1}
Hello world!
I hope that your day is proceeding \emph{splendidly}!
\chapter{Chapter 2}
Hello again, world!
\end{document}
%
Isn't it much more elegant? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.189.90.55 ( talk) 2009-09-21T07:08:53 (UTC)
Could someone who is not affliated with a DocBook software vendor please assess whether the following products deserve mention? As the article states, any XML Editor can also be a functional DocBook editor. The features listed for the products that are mentioned are not unique to those products, nor does this list reflect what are the most commonly-used DocBook editors. In my opinion, all of the following text is spam and should be removed:
A number of XML editing suites exist that come with DocBook schemas, including Emacs in nXML mode and XML Copy Editor. There are also WYSIWYG editors like XMLmind Editor; the Oxygen XML Editor's Author mode, which displays the DocBook document with CSS-based visual formatting for the individual elements; and Syntext Serna, which performs on-the-fly XSL transformations (XSLT).
Thanks, Walk Up Trees ( talk) 22:46, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
I miss a section on DocBook viewers.-- 78.48.71.81 ( talk) 09:17, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
The links section seems misleading. It says "DocBook.org official site" -- which seems to imply this is the official site for DocBook, which it isn't (though it is a very good site!). It's the official site for the O'Reilly book about DocBook. If there's an official site for DocBook (the standard), it's probably the OASIS one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.16.250.100 ( talk • contribs) 2004-10-28T17:32:31 (UTC)
== Redirection from WikiText ==
Eh, why is tag
WikiText redirected to this term? Probably mistake?
--
Martin Kozák 23:16, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
DocBook 5 final looks like it's going to drop any time now. When it does, should the article be updated to talk about DocBook 5, and simply mention that there were prior SGML and XML DTD-defined versions? Korval 05:30, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Can someone compare this with Latex/Tex?-- Adoniscik ( talk) 16:41, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
\documentclass[12pt]{article}
\title{Very simple book}
\begin{document}
\maketitle
\chapter{Chapter 1}
Hello world!
I hope that your day is proceeding \emph{splendidly}!
\chapter{Chapter 2}
Hello again, world!
\end{document}
%
Isn't it much more elegant? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.189.90.55 ( talk) 2009-09-21T07:08:53 (UTC)
Could someone who is not affliated with a DocBook software vendor please assess whether the following products deserve mention? As the article states, any XML Editor can also be a functional DocBook editor. The features listed for the products that are mentioned are not unique to those products, nor does this list reflect what are the most commonly-used DocBook editors. In my opinion, all of the following text is spam and should be removed:
A number of XML editing suites exist that come with DocBook schemas, including Emacs in nXML mode and XML Copy Editor. There are also WYSIWYG editors like XMLmind Editor; the Oxygen XML Editor's Author mode, which displays the DocBook document with CSS-based visual formatting for the individual elements; and Syntext Serna, which performs on-the-fly XSL transformations (XSLT).
Thanks, Walk Up Trees ( talk) 22:46, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
I miss a section on DocBook viewers.-- 78.48.71.81 ( talk) 09:17, 1 February 2011 (UTC)