This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Diyarbakır article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
1Auto-archiving period: 365 days
![]() |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Although this topic is mentioned, more questions are raised than answered. What is clear is that a lot of buildings in Sur were damaged in the battles up until 2016. What is not clear is the process by which much of Sur was subsequently demolished, i.e. who was responsible, and why buildings, especially many old buildings of historical interest, were not restored. Dadge ( talk) 23:58, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
According to wiki pages below and references in this pages, the city of Tigranocerta is not Diyarbakır but it is an ancient city in the valley of the Garzan river. /info/en/?search=Battle_of_Tigranocerta /info/en/?search=Tigranocerta
It is not logic that wikipedia offers two very different info.
According wikipedia in Armenian language, name of the city is "Դիարբեքիրը" (lit. Diyarbekir) in Armenian language. amedcj 16:14, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Why did what I added was reverted twice on Turkish dialect spoken in Diyarbakir and resmeblance to Azerbaijani? Chelik99 ( talk) 21:36, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
NeoRetro, the claims you've restored in that caption ( [1]) are unsourced and at least partly inaccurate, since I've seen no reports of the western half being demolished and the eastern half is not entirely gone either. The destruction of the old city can only be properly explained inline, so please add further details, with reliable sources, to the inline discussion of this that comes a short distance below, rather than inserting unsourced commentary into the caption of an unrelated (16th-century) image above. R Prazeres ( talk) 16:10, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Diyarbakır article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
1Auto-archiving period: 365 days
![]() |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Although this topic is mentioned, more questions are raised than answered. What is clear is that a lot of buildings in Sur were damaged in the battles up until 2016. What is not clear is the process by which much of Sur was subsequently demolished, i.e. who was responsible, and why buildings, especially many old buildings of historical interest, were not restored. Dadge ( talk) 23:58, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
According to wiki pages below and references in this pages, the city of Tigranocerta is not Diyarbakır but it is an ancient city in the valley of the Garzan river. /info/en/?search=Battle_of_Tigranocerta /info/en/?search=Tigranocerta
It is not logic that wikipedia offers two very different info.
According wikipedia in Armenian language, name of the city is "Դիարբեքիրը" (lit. Diyarbekir) in Armenian language. amedcj 16:14, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Why did what I added was reverted twice on Turkish dialect spoken in Diyarbakir and resmeblance to Azerbaijani? Chelik99 ( talk) 21:36, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
NeoRetro, the claims you've restored in that caption ( [1]) are unsourced and at least partly inaccurate, since I've seen no reports of the western half being demolished and the eastern half is not entirely gone either. The destruction of the old city can only be properly explained inline, so please add further details, with reliable sources, to the inline discussion of this that comes a short distance below, rather than inserting unsourced commentary into the caption of an unrelated (16th-century) image above. R Prazeres ( talk) 16:10, 25 October 2023 (UTC)