![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I propose a few things to be added to the list:
Houdinipeter ( talk) 02:12, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
I propose adding at the beginning a section on the concept of Creative Destruction. Christenson does not add or modify this well established term to be credited with the first to observe it. (He may, however, been the one to popularize the term "Disruption" for creative destruction) /info/en/?search=Creative_destruction
Why is VoIP listed as a disruptive technology that has displaced analog and fixed digital telephones? That battle is in its early phases and is nowhere near complete. I'm loathe to delete it without mentioning it here first. Comments? -- Chairboy 01:36, 18 Aug 2004 (UTC)
DVD over VHS isn't too bad of an example, although larger business forces were at work; the media conglomerates overnight anointed the DVD as VHS's successor. All things being equal, the progression should have gone from VHS to Laserdisc to DVD to online video...it goes to show, the best guy doesn't always win. - quanta, Sep 17
In my view DVD over VHS is not a disruptive technology, since it´s neither cheaper nor lower in performance than the DVD. But, whatever —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.220.4.218 ( talk) 09:42, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Disruptive innovation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:03, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I propose a few things to be added to the list:
Houdinipeter ( talk) 02:12, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
I propose adding at the beginning a section on the concept of Creative Destruction. Christenson does not add or modify this well established term to be credited with the first to observe it. (He may, however, been the one to popularize the term "Disruption" for creative destruction) /info/en/?search=Creative_destruction
Why is VoIP listed as a disruptive technology that has displaced analog and fixed digital telephones? That battle is in its early phases and is nowhere near complete. I'm loathe to delete it without mentioning it here first. Comments? -- Chairboy 01:36, 18 Aug 2004 (UTC)
DVD over VHS isn't too bad of an example, although larger business forces were at work; the media conglomerates overnight anointed the DVD as VHS's successor. All things being equal, the progression should have gone from VHS to Laserdisc to DVD to online video...it goes to show, the best guy doesn't always win. - quanta, Sep 17
In my view DVD over VHS is not a disruptive technology, since it´s neither cheaper nor lower in performance than the DVD. But, whatever —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.220.4.218 ( talk) 09:42, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Disruptive innovation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:03, 14 December 2016 (UTC)