![]() | Disruptive eye mask has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: April 4, 2020. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Thank you for a very interesting article! Early in the article it says by predators to help them approach their prey. I would appreciate some explanation of this. I get the impression (I really hope this is right) that disruptive eye masks have evolved because they make it difficult for predators to find and attack the eye of the prey in which they have evolved. This makes it counterintuitive that they should help the predators approach the prey. Maybe there is a trade off here. To mask the eye the mask must be distinctive. But that it is still advantageous because the effect of comouflage is greater than the effect of making the whole prey more discernible. If this is right, I think it would be good to have it in the article. -- Ettrig ( talk) 09:09, 15 March 2020 (UTC)#
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: FunkMonk ( talk · contribs) 21:19, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
I believe that's all done to date now. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 11:33, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
![]() | Disruptive eye mask has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: April 4, 2020. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Thank you for a very interesting article! Early in the article it says by predators to help them approach their prey. I would appreciate some explanation of this. I get the impression (I really hope this is right) that disruptive eye masks have evolved because they make it difficult for predators to find and attack the eye of the prey in which they have evolved. This makes it counterintuitive that they should help the predators approach the prey. Maybe there is a trade off here. To mask the eye the mask must be distinctive. But that it is still advantageous because the effect of comouflage is greater than the effect of making the whole prey more discernible. If this is right, I think it would be good to have it in the article. -- Ettrig ( talk) 09:09, 15 March 2020 (UTC)#
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: FunkMonk ( talk · contribs) 21:19, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
I believe that's all done to date now. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 11:33, 4 April 2020 (UTC)