This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
It is said in the article : "Despite the fact that the treatise was meant to parody the Socinian Anabaptist belief that Jesus of Nazareth was not divine, several anti-feminists utilized a literal interpretation of the tract to support their views."
Is it possible to give a precise reference about the use of the Disputatio by anti-feminists ? Ian Maclean writes in his book The Renaissance notion of woman, p. 13, that the Disputation, in its time, "provokes nothing but refutation".
Thanks,
Marvoir (
talk)
13:50, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is said in the article : "Despite the fact that the treatise was meant to parody the Socinian Anabaptist belief that Jesus of Nazareth was not divine, several anti-feminists utilized a literal interpretation of the tract to support their views."
Is it possible to give a precise reference about the use of the Disputatio by anti-feminists ? Ian Maclean writes in his book The Renaissance notion of woman, p. 13, that the Disputation, in its time, "provokes nothing but refutation".
Thanks,
Marvoir (
talk)
13:50, 29 December 2009 (UTC)