![]() | Polymers ( inactive) | |||
|
I think the the author has got the number avg and the weight avg backwards. it's numb avg / weight avg. not other way around.
The main issue with this edit is that the "new terminology" isn't used by actual researchers. It's a little silly to "retire" the commonly used meaning, when the "new" term isn't used by anyone other than IUPAC. (+)H3N- Protein\Chemist- CO2(-) 15:09, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
As a chemist, I noticed that this page is filled with references towards polymeric dispersity and only paragraph 2 and 3 are about the general dispersity. Shouldn't at least a heading called "Polymers" be used? And another heading with info about the colloidal dispersity?
![]() | Polymers ( inactive) | |||
|
I think the the author has got the number avg and the weight avg backwards. it's numb avg / weight avg. not other way around.
The main issue with this edit is that the "new terminology" isn't used by actual researchers. It's a little silly to "retire" the commonly used meaning, when the "new" term isn't used by anyone other than IUPAC. (+)H3N- Protein\Chemist- CO2(-) 15:09, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
As a chemist, I noticed that this page is filled with references towards polymeric dispersity and only paragraph 2 and 3 are about the general dispersity. Shouldn't at least a heading called "Polymers" be used? And another heading with info about the colloidal dispersity?