![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | On 20 December 2008, Condusiv Technologies was linked from Slashdot, a high-traffic website. ( Traffic) All prior and subsequent edits to the article are noted in its revision history. |
User:Coren, why would you tag this as a speedy delete? This page is about a major software company, producers of the well-known Diskeeper software? This page also helps resolve a debate on the Diskeeper talk page, that being the relevancy of the scientology-related content on said article. The scientology stuff belongs here, because it relates to the company itself, not the Diskeeper product. If you feel that this page has no merit, then why don't you go after the Raxco Software page, an article on a similar company that has even less content than this one, even though this one was just created. — EagleOne\ Talk 02:43, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
I can and do remove the speedy tag, which I think is unreasonable altogether. Of course, anyone who thinks otherwise and wants to pursue the matter can and should take the discussion to AfD DGG 03:14, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
This article mentions "management technology" several times. Does this phrase have a meaning in English? It sounds like a marketing term. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.44.244.158 ( talk) 11:40, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
Judging from the ludicrously dense corporatese buzzword thicket that is the announcement, the company must still be operating in the Scientology order of things. Only an Operating Thetan VI or above could wax so ineloquently opaque... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.175.91.161 ( talk) 17:20, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Now that the company has adopted both a new name and logo, plus all the coporate branding that comes with it, surely it would be best to create a new article, put all of the content from this one into the new one, and then forward from this one to the next?
I've done a bit of updating, but I don't have time to find a good sample of the logo that would fit well in the title of the article to replace the Diskeeper one. I kind of regarded my modifications yesterday as a provisional change until the following questions are resolved:
1. Whether the create a new article solely for Condusiv is created, and leave this one solely concerning the history when operating as Diskeeper Corporation
2. OR, do as above and simply move the whole lot lock stock to new article to replace this one altogether.
Williamh120 6th March 2012 20:27 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Condusiv Technologies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:10, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | On 20 December 2008, Condusiv Technologies was linked from Slashdot, a high-traffic website. ( Traffic) All prior and subsequent edits to the article are noted in its revision history. |
User:Coren, why would you tag this as a speedy delete? This page is about a major software company, producers of the well-known Diskeeper software? This page also helps resolve a debate on the Diskeeper talk page, that being the relevancy of the scientology-related content on said article. The scientology stuff belongs here, because it relates to the company itself, not the Diskeeper product. If you feel that this page has no merit, then why don't you go after the Raxco Software page, an article on a similar company that has even less content than this one, even though this one was just created. — EagleOne\ Talk 02:43, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
I can and do remove the speedy tag, which I think is unreasonable altogether. Of course, anyone who thinks otherwise and wants to pursue the matter can and should take the discussion to AfD DGG 03:14, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
This article mentions "management technology" several times. Does this phrase have a meaning in English? It sounds like a marketing term. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.44.244.158 ( talk) 11:40, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
Judging from the ludicrously dense corporatese buzzword thicket that is the announcement, the company must still be operating in the Scientology order of things. Only an Operating Thetan VI or above could wax so ineloquently opaque... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.175.91.161 ( talk) 17:20, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Now that the company has adopted both a new name and logo, plus all the coporate branding that comes with it, surely it would be best to create a new article, put all of the content from this one into the new one, and then forward from this one to the next?
I've done a bit of updating, but I don't have time to find a good sample of the logo that would fit well in the title of the article to replace the Diskeeper one. I kind of regarded my modifications yesterday as a provisional change until the following questions are resolved:
1. Whether the create a new article solely for Condusiv is created, and leave this one solely concerning the history when operating as Diskeeper Corporation
2. OR, do as above and simply move the whole lot lock stock to new article to replace this one altogether.
Williamh120 6th March 2012 20:27 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Condusiv Technologies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:10, 12 August 2017 (UTC)