GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
I'll do this one. Reviewer: Chiswick Chap ( talk · contribs) 15:44, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
This is a thorough and well-cited article and I have few comments to make on it.
Thanks for giving the article a review! I've gone over your comments/suggestions and I believe I have responded to all of them, which they are minor enough. I think I got all the book ISPN's (Gamow's 1931 book has nothing, however - a book that was outdated and shown to be all wrong within a year!!!), but I might have missed one. I am reluctant to include photos of Aston and Moseley - mainly because it would elevate them to the level of Rutherford/Chadwick/Fermi, which they were not. Also because the article then seems to have too many people - an article about the people who discovered the neutron, rather than neutron itself. I've included the mass spectrometer photo however - I've tried to highlight how primitive this all was, hence amazing, which this image is consistent with. Bdushaw ( talk) 16:55, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
This article is easily up to the required standard and I'm glad to have been able to suggest some small improvements to a fascinating and human story. If you're thinking of going on to FAC, I'd advise you to take great care with polishing the references. Meanwhile, my congratulations on an excellent article, and I'd like to invite you to review one or two of the many interesting articles awaiting a GA reviewer. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 18:45, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
I'll do this one. Reviewer: Chiswick Chap ( talk · contribs) 15:44, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
This is a thorough and well-cited article and I have few comments to make on it.
Thanks for giving the article a review! I've gone over your comments/suggestions and I believe I have responded to all of them, which they are minor enough. I think I got all the book ISPN's (Gamow's 1931 book has nothing, however - a book that was outdated and shown to be all wrong within a year!!!), but I might have missed one. I am reluctant to include photos of Aston and Moseley - mainly because it would elevate them to the level of Rutherford/Chadwick/Fermi, which they were not. Also because the article then seems to have too many people - an article about the people who discovered the neutron, rather than neutron itself. I've included the mass spectrometer photo however - I've tried to highlight how primitive this all was, hence amazing, which this image is consistent with. Bdushaw ( talk) 16:55, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
This article is easily up to the required standard and I'm glad to have been able to suggest some small improvements to a fascinating and human story. If you're thinking of going on to FAC, I'd advise you to take great care with polishing the references. Meanwhile, my congratulations on an excellent article, and I'd like to invite you to review one or two of the many interesting articles awaiting a GA reviewer. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 18:45, 6 December 2017 (UTC)